As the source is also from a letter, it is unlikely the Duke of Suffolk would not have feared angering Wolsey as otherwise the letter would have been private. In comparison to this, Source 2 may not be very reliable either as Wolsey would not have wanted to upset Henry and so would make events seem a lot more positive than they may have been. It can also be suggested that as source 2 was written 2 years after source 1, Wolsey had failed to use his contacts efficiently which supports claims made in source 1. Despite all of this, Wolsey did
Borden knew the war could not be won without reinforcements and so he decided to pass the conscription bill. (Cruxton and Wilson, 118). In 1940, though Mackenzie King had promised no conscription, he passed the national resources mobilization act—this was conscription but only to protect Canada at home. But as war continued Mackenzie King was asked to send additional troops and just like in 1917 most volunteers were English, not French-Canadian. The English-Canadians sought after full conscription like Britain and the United States, while the French-Canadians still did not want any form of conscription.
This is amplified by the fact that the larger pressure groups can leave many smaller ones in their shadow. For example, the British Stammering Association is a small pressure group with a good cause but one that many people will not have heard of due to its lack of funds and support. Many say that pressure groups holding the government to account and challenging authority is a sign of a healthy democracy. After all, a democracy is a system of government where decisions are arrived at by majoritarian principles. If a certain group of people do not feel that they are being represented then a democracy has to be able to recognise them for anything to change.
Rather they are basing their facts on controversial issues. Granted this might be the reasons families have changed, but Fox and Fumia should have conducted their own research on this subject matter to make their article more reliable. Interviewing several families, does not proof why the constructions of families have differed from the traditional family. Further, none of the families interviewed by Fox and Fumia held the government liable for their new way of life. They simply choose this way of life, because it suited them the best.
* Paul Rusesabagina said in a lecture that the film was "less violent" than the actual genocide, claiming that "you couldn't invite someone to watch the real thing." A work is historically accurate when it accurately depicts the time period of the setting, as well as major events in the right sequence. Fictional characters can be used to help describe the historical event, but they can’t be the sole reason for any occurrence. Early European colonists favoured the Tutsis because they had lighter skin, therefore they were given more opportunities in big businesses/government than Hutus. Physical attributes and level of intelligence differentiated the two tribes.
Do you agree with the view that conscientious objectors were treated fairly by the authorities during the First World War? It can be argued that conscientious objectors were not taken seriously at all during WW1 and were treated significantly unfairly during tribunals, which decided their role in the war for instance, and were merely seen as selfish and cowardly, with no worthy role to offer the country in a time of war. Alternatively however it could be argued that conscientious objectors were treated with fairness and respected and judged on their religious objections, taken seriously in a strict and proper court formality, this idea in particular is supported by aspects of each source, and to an extent is also challenged somewhat by the content of certain sources. Source 7, an extract by Historian Adrian Gregory, provides the statistic that “the odds of gaining at least a temporary exemption at a
Explain why the Nazi Regime proclaimed “Total War” in February 1943. (12 Marks) One factor behind why the Nazi regime went ahead with total war was because it offered a chance to revive public morale following the defeat at Stalingrad. The public morale down at this point however going to war with allies seemed the perfect opportunity in regaining the trust of people in the regime. Josef Goebbels speech proved to be a great example in uplifting the people’s moods in regards to total war. His powerful speech was influential and enabled the German public to feel more optimistic within the war as well as regime.
Churchill was known to be an excellent speaker. In order to defend the morale of the country, Churchill highlighted the positive parts of the operation. By saying it was a “miracle” it suggest to us that Dunkirk was not an easy battle to fight and evacuate the army in order to defend their country however, the British did this very well and evacuated as much as possible to safe their country. Dunkirk is referred to as a "miracle" simply because the Germans should have, and could have, easily wiped out the British expedition. The German high command halted as the army was about to go for the kill (on orders from Hitler who at times would lose his nerve temporarily).
The veterans were taking the better clients giving themselves a better commission. This also left the territories under worked and not producing as many sales as possible. The final problem that Dave Thomas encountered was enforcing the strategy and policy with the older sales people. While the younger sales people are driven and respectful to new changes, the veteran sales reps are used to the old way and the enforcement of new changes is difficult. As far as strategy, there is consistently a discrepancy between selling high volume or selling only high margin items.
The success of a new film can be defined as either commercial success or critical success. Commercial success is more important to mainstream films, whilst critical success is more important to independent films. A good film script for a mainstream film will be simplistic and predictive so that it appeals to mass audiences. Also the film script will belong to a clear genre and will have a structured storyline. If the majority of the population finds the script of a film to be unclear and hard to understand then they will give their friends that feedback and so people won’t go to see the film, which is especially bad for a mainstream film as they cost millions to produce and rely on commercial success.