How Far Did the West Want German Rearmament?

460 Words2 Pages
German rearmament was a key reason for the outbreak of WW2; the Germans resented the restrictions imposed on them by the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler's rise to power increased the speed of rearmament, the annexing of Austria-Hungary, areas of Czechoslovakia and the NAP with the USSR all prompted the events from 1939-1945. France and Britain being the two biggest powers in the League of Nations should have been expected to do more, as well as this France was especially harsh on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles. Essentially, the French and British did nothing. Britain was still recovering from the Depression which had devastated her economy; her economy could not afford a major conflict. The French preferred a defensive policy against a potential German threat and she spent time and money building the vast Maginot Line - a series of vast forts on the French and German border. The most Britain, France and Italy did was to form the Stresa Front which issued a protest against Hitler's rearmament policy but did nothing else. It seemed that Britain was even supporting Germany’s breaking of the Treaty of Versailles. This treaty had clearly stated what Germany’s navy should be - no submarines and only six warships over 10,000 tons. In June 1935 the Anglo-German Naval Agreement was signed. This allowed Germany to have one third of the tonnage of the British navy’s surface fleet (probably the largest in the world at this time) and an equal tonnage of submarines. A possible explanation of this was that Britain wanted a strong Germany as a buffer between the Soviet Union and the West and thus followed a policy of appeasement. It was believed that Nazi Germany would develop her navy regardless and that an official agreement between Nazi Germany and Britain would do much to foster relations between both countries. There was also a feeling in some quarters in Britain, that
Open Document