Have you ever wondered what it would be like to go back in the past and experience life through a different time era? The early 1900s was much different then the way we all have it now. To the opinion of most old-timers, most of the kids now would survive with the lack of technology. How could just a hundred years make a difference? You’d be surprised how different it really was back in the early 1900s.
Source 16 supports the statement by saying ‘In 1870, the Government made elementary education up to the age of 13 compulsory for all children.’ This shows that by opening education to all children aged 13 and below, they had approached the problem of uneducated children especially boys from falling into lower classes. Source 17 also agrees, ‘Before 1870, education was not compulsory and it was not free.’ The government had then opened a branch for the lower classes to become educated and somehow improve their quality of life. By opening up school board and creating new schools, it meant that fees were eventually to be taken off, when after the 1902 education act, schools that were receiving state funding had to offer 25% of all places without fees. Gladstone the prime minister at the time believed in equality of opportunity, so over the coming years, showed open support about children receiving open education for all ages. He openly says about passing the political power to an uneducated nation and improving people’s quality of life, therefore showing support.
2.2. - The impact of current policies, frameworks and influences on the Early Years sector is that it is bringing everyone together as a whole. The Welfare and Rights of the children are now taken more seriously. Children are now able to play, engage in and express themselves freely and are being heard. With all groups linked together, working with the same child will mean that the child will learn more effectively.
Why it should be valued Diversity should be valued because nobody is completed the same as everybody else. By respecting and valuing the Diversity this can help growth within that person and also within the workplace as they will learn from each other and will be able to be their selves. Within the workplace we make sure that all the students and staff are treated equally. Everyone will have something to offer to the workplace and have strong/skills that they will be able to contribute to the School. This will make the workplace friendlier and welcome to work in.
This essay will assess the extent to which educational policies have been meritocratic. Meritocracy is where a pupil’s ability, rather than their class background, income, ethnicity or gender, determines the school they go to and the grades they get. So something based more around achievement and not ascription. Before the Education Act (1994), children of different classes and backgrounds all received very different educations. The parents of children from wealthy middle class backgrounds (bourgeoisie) could afford to send their child to public and grammar schools to receive an academic education.
The curricula is designed to increase student achievement and understand of all subject areas using hybrid classes and project based learning. Courses are taught with an inclusive approach. All students, including students with Individualized Education Plans ( IEP’s) and English Language Learners (ELL’s) are taught with the same expectation of achievement and level of rigor. Teachers are encouraged to differentiate with time and assessments. Additionally, all students have access to college prep course, including Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate course.
Gaspar Tavira WRT 95 Ms. Boza 9/12/ 2012 “Freemont High School” “Engaging with the Text” questions 1-4 p648 1. The shame of the nation supports the story title and what is says throughout the story. The main reasons are because students at Freemont High were being put into portable classes which are like trailers. In each class there would be up to 40 students. That was not the right way to treat the students.
It has been proven in the mid-90s by a Dr. Gary Peltier in the article (Year Round School is not a good Idea) that when the scores of year-round school students were compared to those of traditional calendar students, no significant difference was seen. b. In a study in North Carolina it was showed that the study of reading and math test scores of more than 345,000 students found year-round schools had no academic advantage over traditional calendar schools. II. The next issue on board is that year round school would improve the social life of a student.
This new law omitted access to education, prompting a growing debate about the Government's continuing tolerance of discrimination against disabled children and young people. The 1996 Education Act. This law repeated the qualified integration duties of the 1993 Act and consolidated a mass of other education legislation in one major, new Act. 1997 Excellence for all children: meeting special educational needs. Four months after sweeping to power, the new Labour Government published this far-seeing Green Paper on special education and gave major support for all mainstream schools to become much more inclusive.
Today’s teenagers have a lower drop out rate with a higher percentage of completion for a high school degree. What shocked me most during my interview was hearing that in the particular part of Haiti that my subject lived in, at the time, was prone to having all children in school either by private institution (for those who could afford it) or by public institutions funded by government programs. Homework wasn’t given but studying was a must and quizzes were given regularly the following day. During those days long ago in Haiti unless you were of a poor farming family children were no expected to work