But which was more significant? In this essay I will explain the two events and give my opinion on which event was more significant. The first of the two events was the Black Death. The Black Death was a terrible plague that happened in the 1300s. The disease spread from nation to nation, killing millions of people and seriously affecting their lives especially Britain.
The Black Death was on of the most severe epidemics in history. In 1347 A.D., this great plague swept over Europe, ravaging cities and causing widespread hysteria and death. The Black Death is estimated to have killed 30% – 60% of Europe's population, reducing the world's population from an estimated 450 million to between 350 and 375 million in 1400. This has been seen as having created a series of religious, social and economic upheavals, which had profound effects on the course of European history. It took 150 years for Europe's population to recover.
The invasion by barbarians in Rome led Europe into major depression. This is because Rome was considered a superpower in Europe and when a superpower falls, the trade and economy in Europe will weaken. The bad times of the economy continued when the plague (also known as the Black Death) happened from 1350 to 1450. This plague was almost fatal and it took half of the population in Europe. The only way of escaping of the disease was to move from the city to the country.
After reading their reports Henry VIII decided to close down 376 monasteries. Monastery land was seized and sold off cheaply to nobles and merchants. They in turn sold some of the lands to smaller farmers. This process meant that a large number of people had good reason to support the monasteries being closed. However, many people disagreed with the way Henry had stolen the property of the monks and nuns.
This disease killed tens of thousands of Indians in the New World. Syphilis was the most deadly disease for the Europeans. This was a disease that was transmitted sexually. This was most common with sailors who went long periods of time without women. So once they touched down on land they would contract this disease.
Dissolution of the monateries uk Why did Henry VIII dissolve the Monasteries? [24] Henry VIII started dissolving the monasteries in mid 1530s when his attitude towards them changed completely and he started to shut them down starting with the small houses and then the large ones. One of the main reasons for the dissolution has got to be the fact that there was a lot of wealth in the monasteries and with Henry spending a lot of his inheritance that his father left him he was now looking for new ways to build up some money to fund any military campaigns he was holding and getting all of the items of value would go down better than raising taxes again so Cromwell and his team were sent and they created a list of all the possessions of the monasteries. From that list Henry could see that the money involved in the monasteries is very high so the order was passed. The money was used to help Henry with the money issues he was in as he had a very lavish lifestyle and he needed more money as he had spent all the money Henry II had left for him and it was also a reason for his break from Rome.
Alexandria Behr Medicine in London during the Middle Ages In the medieval world, death and disease were a part of daily life for everyone. Society was ravaged by successive outbreaks of the plague that later came to be known as the “Black Death.” It is estimated that at least a third of the population of London died of this horrific disease by the end of the fourteenth century. In modern society, when one feels ill, one goes to the doctor and is often issued prescriptions to aid in one's recovery. In the Middle Ages, however, the solutions to illness were much less exact. Due to limited, illnesses could be treated in a variety of ways depending on one’s personal beliefs.
The purpose of this essay is to reflect on the relationship between food and culture and how people in Shakespearian times used the two to overcome The Bubonic Plague. The Black Plague was an epidemic that took the lives of one-third of all Europeans during the time Shakespeare was alive. With the plague running rapid, many people became corrupt in order to find food and support there families. In Kastan’s A Companion to Shakespeare, he says, “the high prices and shortages of food, were wicked, wondering, idle people whose thefts were at the heart of all the trouble.” (34) He then goes on to say, in regards to the new corrupt people: Worse, the cost of imprisoning them all meant that there was no money left over to relieve the truly needy poor. His answer to these problems was straight forward: harsher laws and sharper law enforcement to stop the mouths of these people who laugh in their sleeves at the lenity of the law and the timorousness of the executioners of it… There was much seditious talk (for which many were hanged), and in Kent alone there were eleven riots connected with these shortages of grain between 1585 and 1603.
What impact did Plague have on England during the period 1348-1500? Yersinia pestis, more commonly known as ‘the Black Death’, was responsible for the death of up to 200 million people globally, including at the very least “over one-third of the population” of England. Clearly such a major historic event had many widespread impacts. These range of impacts range from impacts on popular culture and art, including the eerie and spectacle late-medieval fascination with death in images such as the Danse Macabre¸ to widespread persecution of minorities, such as the Jews, blamed for transmitting the disease. However this essay will focus on what it believes to be the greatest impacts the Plague had on England – the impact on demographics, the impact on social mobility, and the impact on religion.
Health checks were not always helpful though; if a woman was found to have a disease, she would be evicted from the brothel and sent out in to the streets, where she would often still work as a prostitute, despite her condition. Early in the century, attempts to close brothels began. The fear of syphilis was running rampant, and Henry IV shut down brothels in 1504. They reopened a year later with decreased numbers; by that time, most women had scattered across London. In 1546, Henry VIII got rid of brothels again with a proclamation stating that it was an end to “toleration of such dissolute and miserable persons as have been suffered to dwell in common open places called the stews without punishment or correction (for) their abominable and detestable sin.” (Castelli).