How Accurate Is It to Say That Peaceful Protests Were the Most Important Reason for the Improvement of Civil Rights of African Americans in the Years 1945-1960?

850 Words4 Pages
How accurate is it to say that peaceful protests were the most important reason for the improvement of civil rights of African Americans in the years 1945-1960? Although the peaceful protests in the years 1945-1960, such as the the Montgomery bus boycott, 1955-56, had a large influence on general public opinion of civil rights. However, the legal campaigns of the NAACP and other organisations had a bigger, more direct impact on the improvement of civil rights. It is accurate to say that the peaceful protests contributed to the improvement of civil rights, but were not the most important reason. Peaceful protests continuingly occurred in the years 1945-1960, but their effectiveness were limited and often did not make the striking impact they were designed to create. However, peaceful protests were effective in drawing public and media attention. Television pictures of police brutality against unarmed peaceful protesters did much to persuade the American public that segregation should end. However, such campaigns in Albany and others showed that the method did not guarantee success. The Greensboro sit-ins of 1960 are an example of successful peaceful protests. The sit-ins started with four local students who sat in a white’s only area at a Woolworth’s. The protest quickly escalated, 27 students came on the second day; 300 by the fourth. These sit-ins were hugely influential and rapidly spread throughout the country. By the beginning of 1961, over 70,000 people, black and white, had taken part in demonstrations against segregation in public places. Although this seems successful on the outside, the only real achievement of the Greensboro protests was increased influence in the public. This is the case with the majority of the peaceful protests. They managed to gain public attention and influence but did not directly cause any major improvements in civil
Open Document