Because you do not know what the other one is bringing into the relationship, a new relationship is the hardest to know what is being brought into the relationship. Until one know how to share, trust and care. The three things a person needs to have a good relationship are good communication, trust, and respect. If a relationship does not have any of these things then it becomes hard to have a very successful relationship. If you would want to build a strong relationship with one partner they must have respect for each other.
By accepting yourself you can grow and gain self-confidence. I also chose honesty, but again we both have different definitions. My definition of honesty is admitting to your mistake and truly wanting to make it right by telling the truth. My biggest pet peeve is when somebody cheats, it isn’t fun for anybody else and they aren’t being trustworthy. As soon as I meet someone I trust them until they do something to take that trust away.
The two virtues, certainty and doubt are very controversial. The doubt somebody has can cloud their judement but it can also guide them in making a better decision. On the other hand, certainty can blind someone from seeing their true colors of something. In our modern society, doubt is looked down upon; or viewed as a negative idea. Doubt doesnt always contradict certainty, but instead somewhere in between.
What is more important and most essential, are the attitudes and treatment of one another. It is best of all to have honesty, communication and appreciation. With honesty, you find security and confidence that you can trust someone. Without honesty, there will be no true communication, lying is story-telling, not expressing what you really feel, believe in, or would like to see in others around you. Honesty truly is "The Best Policy.” When you communicate well, the family is "well".
We cannot predict the future. You lie because you think lying can lead to a better result, although you got a virtue motivation of lying, but a wrong assumption may even put you into a much worsen situation. You can’t simply agree that lying is okay when you have a virtue starting point as you can’t guarantee a better result after lying. We cannot guarantee the result of lying, but we can guarantee one point and it is always true, lying is an act of cheating which is something “wrong”. For instance, a mother got a cancer but only her son knows.
Finally, people of our current culture are selfish in the sense that they take opportunities as they come, and peace organizations are most often than not unable to persuade people that wars have a negative effect on the economy. Peace organizations take great lengths to promote their hope of a perfect and war-free world. What they tend to leave out however, is that they thrive on pessimistic situations. Without the reality of war, peace organizations would not be able to exist. It is a realism that the organizations would not want to confess.
A decision based on rationality is said to be logical, reasoned and sensible, whereas an emotional decision is passion-filled and unreliable. This is only true in some cases, but it is in my opinion that an intelligent person is both emotional and rational, using both of these features in different circumstances to make the best decisions. However, it depends on the situation you’re in whether it would be better to react from an emotional perspective or from a rational one. There are many circumstances under which an emotional person would be clouded from seeing the lack of logic in a situation that a rational person would be able to deal with. If someone is in an abusive relationship, they may not be able to end it because their emotions outweigh they ability to think rationally, whereas to everyone outside of the relationship the only logical thing to do is the end the relationship.
‘What a person should do and what a person wants to do are often not compatible. Doing what one wants to do would usually bring immediate gratification/happiness, but might not benefit the person in the long run. On the other hand, doing what one should do may cause immediate discomfort/unhappiness, even if it is good for the person. This is the underlying message of Kantianism: the purpose of morality is NOT to make you happy! (Although in
When people don't get the rewards for the good performance and cost a little for the misbehavior, they will not trust the management. This crisis of confidence leads to the vicious circle as the sketch presented below. According to the vicious circle graph, any methods cutting down this circle would help to solve the current problem. 4. A further SWOT analysis of the Head Office is presented below.
He needs this contract to keep his job but not “coming clean” is jeopardizing his sense of ethics. What should he do? An ethical dilemma is a situation where there is no right and wrong in relation to a decision and therefore a solution is not quickly achieved (Shaw, Barry, Sansbury, 2009). Ethical dilemma can also be defined by a sense of moral obligation. Kent’s situation does consist of several ethical dilemmas as his accomplishments since joining Dura- Stick have been mediocre at best and he fears that his time at Dura-Stick might be limited unless he starts closing big accounts such as the project proposed from Spray-On.