Marriage is the most important social institution, and it is a formality for the perpetuation of procreation; hence same sex marriage cannot meet this requirement. In other words, same sex marriage does not aid in procreation, which sustains our species. Same sex marriage will destroy our society. Some believe that although gay couples cannot produce children, they can have adopted children and fulfill a social need. That may seem like a good idea, but I am sure that there must be differences between a child who grows up in an environment with same sex couples than with regular heterosexual parents.
It is about giving equal access and opportunities and getting rid of discrimination and intolerance. 1. 2 Someone could ignore a colleague, because they are discriminating them purposely because they come from a different area, class, culture, religion, or they may not actually have anything to do with them because they feel they have nothing in common with them. Indirect discrimination occurs when policies and practices, which appear neutral or fair because they are applied to everyone, actually disadvantage people and particular groups within society. 1.3 By supporting a person’s equality you are treating them as an equal and including them in all activities, you will be reducing the likelihood of discrimination.
The very thing that makes us human is our choice to act or not act, our ability to question, examine and decide. But what happens when the responsibilities of choosing to or not to are placed on another and the persons own ability to choose remains dormant or suppressed due to abiding by another’s standards which have been put forth. What humanly instincts are recessive or dominant, what overcomes the other? Obedience or Defiance? I.
I'm not sure if this is as much of a big deal as some people make it out to be. for some people, if they would have lived together with their spouse, before getting married, I'm sure would have changed their mind in actually marrying that person and would would have changed the outcome of their entire life just by finding out that living with their significant other wouldn't work. There is no such thing as a perfect marriage or a perfect relationship. Everyone knows that there is a lot of give and take to make things work. But what if someone isn't willing to compramise?
What is reason behind it? What we do what we do? What motivates us? Many people would rather not think about this. Some people might not care about true behind everything that we consider as “normal”.
By saying that two people of the same sex should not be allowed to marry for procreations sake, is such the same as saying that none of the above people should be allowed to enter into wedlock because they are not able to reproduce. I believe that society overlooks this point in the argument of procreation against homosexual
Homosexuals go through much turmoil and hatred once they reveal that they are homosexuals because of people known as homophobes. Homophobes are people that believe that homosexuals are basically a curse and they should not exist. Homophobes are also the people that in the end are more likely to end up committing a hatred crime towards a homosexual because they believe that homosexuals should be punished for their sexual orientations. I know that in my own opinion if I was to be a homosexual I don’t think that with the world the way that it is today I would come out and tell
How can one truly feel as though they are accepted if society depends on their ability to conform, to blend in? One must be the same as another in order to avoid judgement or rejection. Individuals interpret this view to mean, ‘to be different is to be judged.’ In every modern society, there are individuals who have been severely damaged by rejection resulting in consequences often grievous or chaotic to the victim, society and devastatingly, the innocent. Though is it the fault of society alone, who is to blame? The determining factor of a person’s ability to feel as though they are accepted, as though they belong, seems to come from ‘pleasing’ society.
A great many have no personal stake in the rights of a group such as homosexuals, perhaps no knowing any, so are less inclined to fight on their side. These people, who may not have a particular objection to an issue such as gay marriage, tend to err on the side of what is generally perceived as “good”. This could derive from simply wishing to follow the status quo, or not to rock the boat. With no direct attachment to a cause, they have no motivation to go out and support it. Others who do support the efforts for equality are often forced side with the religious right for fear of the repercussions that such a solid, motivated power base can bring to bear.
It’s funny how the two people who brought each of us into this world, same blood and genetics as us, can prohibit us from having a diverse and fun-filled life. As a child they’ve preached to us about the importance of being different; being a leader not a follower. What or who exactly would we be leading if our parents don’t give us the freedom to make mistakes or if our life is based on their perished goals. Parents believe that we shouldn’t voice our opinions towards them they consider it “talking back.” I believe that we should voice our opinions for what we believe in. They feel like we aren’t eligible to make our own decisions.