Parents undermined that spanking is a form of abuse. This is not only physical abuse, but also mental abuse. What parent’s don’t realize is that spanking contradicts the values they try to instill on their children. Instead of using the method of spanking parents that cause damage to children, parents should really consider some alternative ways. Better and healthier ways of remanding a child is talk to them, and if that doesn’t work you can resort to punishing them.
A gray area with corporal punishment, however, is where the line to abuse is seen and drawn. Every adult, child, and teen defines spanking differently. Obviously here some believe spanking is a form of abuse, while others merely see it is a good form of discipline. A teen who has the ability to know right and wrong being struck on the bottom may view it as wrong because they could have just been scolded, explained consequences. It is hard for a toddler to see right and wrong when they are just learning and everything is new to them.
If I could change one thing in my community it would be to offer parenting classes. I listen to my friends complain about their relationship with their parents and the lack of communication between them often. What I have come to realize is that both parties don’t know that the relationship is broken and they need to change the way they are talking to each other because obviously it is not working. I believe that if parents knew different ways to talk and help their kids then more could get done in the relationship. It is hard raising kids and hurtful things can be said, but I just don’t think a parent should react in a hurtful manner.
The students could be attack physically by another student (Source G). If that rule applies, injuries would be avoided. 1. The attacks would hurt the student which would cause them to worry about their safety rather than their education. C. The rules are going to break by mischievous student.
Situation1: Children misbehave when they want attention. Children that are seeking attention usually whines, squirm, throw things on the floor and anger outbursts. The staff member ignored the inappropriate behavior; this shows the child that a negative behavior is ineffective and no longer necessary. If I am the staff, I will find out why the child is misbehaving first and then do the appropriate action for his behavior, not just simply ignoring the child. The misbehavior can be prevented if you will ask the child what’s wrong with him and explain that the inappropriate behavior isn’t acceptable to express how he feels.
Spanking helps to teach our kids right from wrong and what path they should follow, if the spanking is a negative treatment that stops them from doing things like, fighting, stealing, lying and any other negative behaviour that will make them not want to do it anymore. It will teach them that the consequences of that behaviour are good and they won’t do it anymore, so child spanking is not abusive it is teaching and instructing. Spanking long term consequences can cause increased aggressiveness in children which is what you would see in an abusive
(Attitudes are prejudices when they are generally disapproved of). A practitioner having negative attitudes. This might mean that their sour treatment will be passed on to the client and the client might become hostile and rude towards the practitioner. A teacher presenting a negative attitude towards a special needs child will mean that the child could become hostile, rude and frustrated and cause a change in behaviour for the worst and decrease in life quality. For example a special needs child trying to colour in a picture with the right colours and getting it wrong and a teacher then says ‘God, you’re doing it wrong’ or’ It’s not very well done’ instead of saying ‘You’re getting good at it’ or ‘ It’s coming out nicely.
For example, it may ruin the feeling of safeness in the school environment for that student. It can even inhibit their ability to excel in academics. In an article written by Elisha Mcneil, it states: A growing body of evidence highlights the connection between adverse childhood experiences and academic problems. The effects of trauma can impair a child’s cognitive ability, while the stress of a dysfunctional or unstable home life can make children act out or shut down in the classroom. In a way, I think that a school not being trauma-informed almost creates an unsafe environment for the student.
These parents make it known when the child is wrong and sometimes even ignore them. There is a lack in the loving and valuing nature that parents should have. Regardless, on both ends of the spectrum the parent will discipline their child when they misbehave because that is how they continue to learn right from wrong. When deciding how much control and/or supervision the parent places on the child lies under demandingness-control or permissiveness-restrictiveness. Controlling parents limit the amount of freedom, further resulting in rules.
They would not have learned the value of working in order to gain. They will put greater emphasis on appearance rather than substance simply because their needs were met with little to no effort of their own. This type of attitude will spill over into their workplace, into their relationship and eventually in their own children. However, there is hope. Recognizing the codependency and accepting it as a role in the dysfunctional family is the first step in breaking the cycle.