Of course, all books are more descriptive. What I liked about the movie is that they actually showed the dream Pony boy had and they also showed Dally robbing the grocery store; something the book doesn't tell. Both the book and the movie are great, and you should watch it, but the book is better. In conclusion as you can tell there are many differences, but there are also many things that are alike between the book and the movie. I enjoyed both the book and the movie, but personally I think the book was better, because the movie left some of the things out that the book had in it.
Each serves its purpose well; the steel frame buildings just do so with more flair. I like to think that only a good movie would still be watched after fifty-three years. But, everything good about the book is missing or distorted (plot, characters, details). The plot is too convoluted to make a movie. But the movie of The Big Sleep is still a success and, well, a good movie, just because they changed the plot and the characters.
I really liked how the author wrote out the character of the young boy. She made the readers feel sorry for him because he was all alone, but then he brings out the gun and you then get a different perspective of him. This was a really good story, I enjoyed reading it and wished there was more to it. I will definitely remember this story for my final. ----------------------- High School
Stanley and his family are constantly unlucky because of a curse that was placed on his great great grandfather. Stanley and the other boys at the camp are forced to dig large holes in the dirt every day. He eventually realizes that they are digging these holes because the Warden is searching for a buried fortune. Stanley befriends many of the other juvenile delinquents as they struggle to deal with life at the camp. One day while digging Stanley finds a lipstick tube with the initials KB on them, we previously found out the history of the site and know realize what the warden is searching for.
Question 20 on the 2011 pass paper, critical essay. The movie 8mile explores in great detail countless emotions from beginning to end. The movie is based around a young rapper called Jimmy B-Rabbit Smith, who is stuck a rut and is struggling to make a success of his life. He has been brought up with racial abuse and is surrounded my violence and drugs everyday of his life. He lives with his mum and her boyfriend in a trailer park due to his dead end job.
He suffered from a bursa on his kneecap which is very painful from his knee hitting the mat constantly. He would also go and fail English 11 due to a corrupted teacher and so called plagiarized decades project. He went to summer school and passed the test telling what needed to learn the first week. There wasn’t anything he really needed to learn so they just gave him extra work so the money he paid wouldn’t be wasted. He also kept up with his exercising daily along with doctor appointments for his left
The changes were made from the movie since the director from the movie did not want to make the book and the movie to much similar to each other. The book Of Mice and Men written by John Steinback shows the struggle in the 1930’s. It tells how people are lonely and how they need a companion. The book and movie both show how reality was hard on lower class people. Of Mice and Men the book is better.
English 67 Comparison Sample Essay I Give It An “A” Many people argue that the book is always better than the movie. They will tell you that the written page offers something that the cinematic one can't, that a movie always leaves out details that the book contains, and that key elements of the original story are often missing in the film version. And these book lovers are often right. But in the case of Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and Will Gluck's Easy A (which is loosely based on Hawthorne's novel), the latter speaks to the modern audience in ways the original never saw coming. Yet, they share two very similar heroines, and offer messages about what it's like to be an outcast.
This got him in trouble in Weed, just like what happened in the 5 chapter of the book with Curley’s wife and his puppy. Another example of a dysfunctional character that john Steinbeck used to make this thrilling story what it is today to the people of the world, is Candy and Carlson both not very big characters in the story. Both are unique in their own way about how they contribute to the story. First Carlson is a specific textbook example of a ranch hand for life in both the book and movie he was a fairly large man that looked in his early or late 30s, he looked and sounded as if he had been working low-end jobs all his life. Then there’s Candy an older man maybe late forty’s early fifties.
It just seems to unethical to me even though I can see how they would be useful. This novel made me think about many aspects of human life. Not only did I ponder how we as a people treat each other and people that are different than us, but I pondered our future and how realistic this novel’s plot can be. I am incredibly glad that I decided to read this book again because I missed out on so much the first time I read