The makeup of the ethnic population in a society can have a big influence on policing as well. Policing in the U.S. started the same as it did in England. It was an informal social control in which citizens protected one another, and relied on the hue and cry and watch and ward system. These were primarily conducted in smaller areas and grow into formal policing when areas grow into larger towns were a police department was needed and established. Policing in the south was drastically different then the north.
The less fortunate people or the poor people lived in back alleys and courtyards of the city unbelievable amount of hours just to support their families. Not everyone had to work like this, only the unfortunate people who were not born into his or her richness. These living and working conditions really divided the rich and the poor which started political parties to form.
They are rare and hard to get access to, having very strict licensing laws. The pro-arming argument is that the Police would be a deterrent and would protect the officers. People who say that arming the Police would be a deterrent use other armed countries as an example of why we should have it; I don't believe this is an accurate view of the matter. Worldwide 2011 crime statistics show that in the USA there were 12, 664 murders, and 8,583 were caused by firearms. Compared to the UK where 648 murders where only 58 were caused by firearms.
Crime data Comparison CJA/314: Criminology Instructor: Chris Hammond By: Christine Kishlock Student: University of Phoenix Crime is a process that takes place when a law is broken; these laws are set in place to keep society at a social normal. When these laws are broken people normally report these activities but in the day and present time it has been more aware to criminal justice officials that most of the criminal behavior is not being reported. In this short comparison paper I will be going over to different metropolitan areas and comparing the rates in crime in a crime category. California holds several different metropolitan areas some are more wide spread than others and can go as far as half the state. The
Essentially, the police will base their use of assets in a manner to reduce crime by building ties within the community and having a presence in neighborhoods. This can be an effective method because many argue that seeing the police in an area a majority of the time deters criminals from acting in those areas. A downfall of the COP theory is that political influence can force a department to pool resources in an area where crime is not as prevalent in order to keep good relations with a major tax base. Often times the poorer neighborhoods do not feel as though they are receiving enough of a police presence. The contingency theory is based on the approach to achieve specific goals, such as crime control.
Federal Law Enforcement Agencies: How They Impact the World Abstract In today’s society, when people think of protection and enforcement of laws, they immediately think of the local police, the local sheriffs, or the highway patrol. Of course, people have heard of the federal law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but what people do not realize is that there are so many more agencies that take part in making sure that the laws of the United States of America are enforced, as well as making sure that the general public is kept safe from enemies both foreign and domestic. Throughout this term paper, many different aspects of federal agencies that enforce laws and also keep the country safe will be brought to light, as well as the many different benefits and downfalls of having such federal agencies. While there are many people that believe that federal law enforcement agencies are only established to make the life of an average citizen difficult, in truth, federal law enforcement agencies only help out this great society. First world examples will also be used in elaborating just how important and necessary federal law enforcement agencies are in today’s day and age, and just how much people of today take these agencies for granted.
Other officers will cover up these actions when filing reports. Police officers do not treat suspects with dignity in many situations. When officers witness the actions of others, they do not report these cases to superiors. The ethical dilemmas that these conflicts can cause include the public not trusting the police force patrolling their communities. The citizens feel they are guilty until proven innocent.
Tray Essix 17 September 2012 ENG 101 B.Dover The True Meaning of Police Discretion Police Discretion to me is the power to make decisions of policy and practice. Police have the choice to enforce certain laws and how they will be enforced. Some law is always or almost always enforced, some is never or almost never enforced, and some is sometimes enforced and sometimes not. Similarly with discretion is that the law may not cover every situation a police officer encounters, so they must use their discretion wisely. Until 1956, people thought of police discretion as "taboo".
This decreased the income of money going into the government which was used for military and other government worthy things. The result of that led to higher taxation on citizens which made the people of Rome upset and ended up having less money to buy necessities and other things to keep the economy rolling. Another important reason was the abundance of slaves in Rome. The large quantity of slaves help lead to the growth of latifundia which is large land estates, consisting mostly of slaves for farming. This ruined the farmers of Rome which in result, they drifted to cities that helped add more unemployment to the cities.
The newly arrived immigrants were also taken advantage of by people who promised jobs, housing, etc. in exchange for money. They had to deal with the high crime rates in the cities and were often left without jobs because of economic changes such as depressions and panics that led to high unemployment. Another problem faced by the Irish was that their expectations and norms were different than those of white, middle class Americans. Most Americans were Protestant and the Irish were Catholic.