citizens, universal healthcare would significantly lower healthcare costs for both the individual and the government. Without a doubt, something should be done to fix the current healthcare system; it is just a matter of what should be done. Over the past several years, the cost of healthcare in the U.S. has risen significantly and does not seem to lower, surpassing “$2.2 trillion in 2007” (An). This ever-increasing cost has caused less and less coverage, being unaffordable to more and more people; “The average American spends about $7,900 dollars per year on healthcare” (Sanders). Though healthcare is currently very costly, studies show that universal healthcare would be cheaper than the current privatized system (Conor).
These people are projected to have incomes too high to qualify for their state’s existing Medicaid programs, but below the federal poverty level (nearly $11,500 for an individual) required to be eligible for federal subsidies to buy private coverage on the new online insurance marketplaces set up by the Affordable Care Act. Medicaid is the state-federal health insurance program for the poor. “Millions of adults will remain outside the reach of the ACA and continue to have limited, if any, options for health coverage,” the study concludes. The law provides full federal funding for three years to states that expand Medicaid to cover residents under 138 percent of the poverty level (or just under $15,900 for an individual). But the Supreme Court made that requirement effectively optional for states, and most Republican led-states have opted against expanding the
3. Barack Obama’s proposed health care reform initiative. [Available on-line; last visited Apr] www.whitehouse.gov The website provides the goals that President Obama has for health care. The plan is not a complete over haul of the system, it instead attempts to increase the number of insured people will cutting down the cost of existing coverage. Ideas include requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions, require more businesses to provide coverage while attempting to offset those costs with tax breaks, and establish a national health insurance exchange that would allow small businesses to collectively buy into a larger group plan.
Many believe it is an individual states decision on how medical expenses be paid, however other’s belief the states should all follow the federal governments lead. The main issue is health care cost will continue to increase because the United States citizens continue to foster blame towards the government. To decrease the cost of health care in the United States we as
2). These statements of information make a person wonder what the president is signing the US up for. Better healthcare is needed for everyone but at what expense. In a 2010 article “Health Care Bill: What Does It Mean for You?” written by Huma Khan, he states that the healthcare bill runs $938 billion which will be paid through higher taxes for the wealthy and Medicare cuts. In the understanding it means that people will receive health care but it means a higher expense for others.
According to data found on the Federal Budget website, we can see that medical care, national defense, and social security are the largest parts of expenditures of the U.S. government. As a member of the Congress, I would like to start reducing these three main expenditures. It is vital that we have a better medical care system. Health care in the United States has a long story, our government had tried to find the solution to this huge problem but they have not being successful yet. We are leaving in one of the most powerful nations in the world and we do not have a decent medical care system.
A Policy Change to Address the Health Care Problem in the United States “8508 USD”, that’s the amount the U.S spent on health per capita in 2011. This is by far the highest spent per capita in the world, but it does not translate to the best health care system in the world. In fact a deeper look at the U.S. health care system shows that it an inequitable and inefficient system which places a heavier burden on the poor than on any other group in the country. The brunt of the high spending on health care is born by the low income earners in the country, leading to unequal health utility and a further increase in the already large income inequality plaguing the country. A change in the U.S. health care system to make it more equitable and efficient
It reviews the advantages and disadvantages as well as the problems and challenges associated with the bill. Obama Healthcare Bill The medical environments around the world have been up to the task of improving their scope. The countries are focused on improving the efficiency within health care; and prefer the alteration of the health care sector. This is done through
Introduction The national expenditure levels in the United States have more than tripled over the last decade (US Census, 2011). Regardless of inconsistencies in national budgets, health care is still in high demand. Unfortunately, nearly half Americans cannot afford health care and are now forced to rely on Medicare and Medicaid. The generation of Baby Boomers, who was once the back bone for American Capitalism, is living with a growing health care crisis. Considering the age of the boomers, health care is essential.
The Federal Government Health Programs Introduction The Federal Governments three health care programs; Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP (child health insurance program) are costing $2.0 trillion per year. These programs accounted for 21 percent of the federal budget in 2010, or $753 billion. The costs of these programs to the Federal Government are astounding and have a large impact on the National Debt. An overhaul of the government health care programs is needed to reduce the continued spending of billions of wastefully dollars. Thesis statement An analysis of the Federal Governments three health care programs reveal a challenging job ahead in order to overhaul the programs to bring about reduce