The new laws where established to protect consumers against health insurers, so no one would be denied coverage because of an illness such as: Cancer, Aids and other chronic diseases. Author Jed Graham’s article, “Obama Care’s impact on Job loss” (2013), emphasizes how the new health care reform law is causing job loss. According to Graham some law firms, school districts and hospitals throughout the United States are facing tough choices with rising insurance cost under Obama Care. Graham shows the scope of this problem by showing that, according to politicians and economist Affordable Care Acts give businesses and incentive to cut worker’s hours below the 30 hour per-week
I am not saying that the bill will not work or that it is not needed, I just believe that more effort and thought should have gone into the proposed plan and what implications it has on all involved before trying to go live with coverage. I guess like everything else, time will tell the overall effectiveness and benefit of Obama Care and will show if it has made us better and more compassionate for those who are less fortunate or has had the opposite effect and has done more damage than good to an already unstable health care industry. References Bailey, L. (2008). Obama and McCain on Health Care Reform. Business & Economic Review, 55(1), 24-29.
What were the problems in the health care system that the Affordable Care Act of 2009 sought to address? What was the public option, and why did it not pass? How would the new health care program be paid for? What were some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act? Some of the things that the Affordable Care Act of 2009 wanted to address were to make it possible for every American citizen to have insurance coverage; another problem they wanted the act to address was the help reduce the soaring cost of Medicaid.
There is no proven link between more spending and better care. (Grunweld, 2009) How doctors would cut health care costs, they would make sure the benefits are substantial once the new law takes full effect in 2014. People with preexisting medical conditions could no longer be denied insurance. (Alderman, 2010) All lifetime and annual limits on coverage would be eliminated and new policies would be required to meet higher benefit standards. How can the country reduce health care costs while not compromising quality?
The new Medicare for All programs would offer more coverage than the current Medicare system. There would be no cost sharing and coverage would be added for prescription drugs, medical equipment, home health care, early prevention, primary care and treatment for drug addiction. To overcome the resistance from some American’s to become a country were health care is provided to all, we would need to allow for a public option program. Physicians for a National Health Program have determined that the most cost-effective route is Medicare for all. Since the United States currently administers the health care system through private insurance companies, it has caused rationing.
Obama Care a for sure No!! The Obama Care act defined as a good way of providing affordable health insurance for the entire nation. How is the nation going to benefit from this act? I personally believe that the Obama Care act is beneficiating doctors and insurance providers by rewarding them, and it also may conclude to depriving people form the doctors or insurance that they have chosen. The Obama Care act is an act to beneficiate doctors and insurance companies by rewarding them.
He was good at cutting deals with the health care industry groups. Baucus also successfully received more 2.5 million dollars from these groups from the health industry. Ignagni pushed Baucus for a bill that would include the ability to buy insurance and bring down public option. Baucus and the White House were also secretly deciding on another deal with Billy Tauzin. He was later hired as the pharmaceutical industry best lobbyist.
In the understanding it means that people will receive health care but it means a higher expense for others. When money talks a person wants to know exactly what they are paying for. According to the health form no matter how much money comes out of pocket a person is stuck with the coverage. David Hogberg, a journalist written an article based on what the health form entailed and no matter what a person wants for coverage or how sick the individual is. “You are young and healthy and want to pay for insurance that reflects that status?
His statement is letting the people of the United States know that as Speaker of the House, he is dedicated to ensuring that the economy pull through its fragile state without any new taxes that he believes would increase the national debt and create another economic hurdle for the United States to climb. By shedding a negative light on this Health Care Overhaul bill, the GOP is also shedding a negative light on the Obama administration. If the GOP can pass the Health care Overhaul Repeal bill, then they would have shown flaws and weakness in Obama’s domestic policy, thus hurting his chances at re-election. Although this may seem like a smart move by the Republicans, it can potentially back-fire. If the repeal is passed, then the GOP loses its “hot button issue” that can help bring in voters for the
citizens, universal healthcare would significantly lower healthcare costs for both the individual and the government. Without a doubt, something should be done to fix the current healthcare system; it is just a matter of what should be done. Over the past several years, the cost of healthcare in the U.S. has risen significantly and does not seem to lower, surpassing “$2.2 trillion in 2007” (An). This ever-increasing cost has caused less and less coverage, being unaffordable to more and more people; “The average American spends about $7,900 dollars per year on healthcare” (Sanders). Though healthcare is currently very costly, studies show that universal healthcare would be cheaper than the current privatized system (Conor).