Some people believe that if no one had guns there would be no crime however, criminals will still find ways to get guns and this will leave everyone else unarmed and vulnerable. The complete banning of guns would not solve the issue of violent crimes it would only remove guns from the hands of individuals who need them for protection. I believe we do need gun control laws in America but not to the extent of banning guns altogether. America needs to concentrate more on ways to keep guns out of the hands of criminals instead of taking them away from the ones that need
Try the questions below. It is fine if you feel that you are not up to my mark, some do and that’s why they are working for me. I don’t sacked workers unless they do something stupid like stealing from me. I will push the police all the way to ensure that you go to court. So think about it before you try or are tempted to do so.
Tourists normally look down on panhandlers because they do not like to be harassed while they are on vacation. If they follow laws for aggressive panhandling such as staying away from ATM’s, not panhandling at night, block a passer-by’s walk way or verbally threaten a person for not giving them any money, then there would be less concerns on panhandling. Therefore, if a panhandler is minding their own business and not bothering anyone, police shouldn’t be harassing them for trying to raise money they need to survive. I believe it does violate their First Amendment Rights and it should not be banned. The local police should not be focused on arresting people not causing any harm; they should be more focused on arresting the people committing more serious
I’m concerned that the government is not doing enough to protect the people event those who don’t want protecting. Even those who put up a fight and want to stay behind it’s best to chain them up and make them go because if it was one of your family members you would do the same. You would want them to be safe even if the disaster was a false alarm and they were in no
However this guy received his information from a source that is not deemed credible in the journalistic area. By doing this This does not mean that someone won't object or try to stop you, even though they don't have the legal authority to do so. Sometimes people, including the police, don't want something publicized, and with this story neither the FBI, the local law enforcement and definitely Mr. Thomas did not want this mess being out there. Even though the charges generally can't be sustained and those authorities risk a false arrest charge, the arrest effectively stops the reporter from covering the event. Thus, in these rare cases, the intended result is achieved and it really did affect the series as Mr. Thomas probably played the worst series in his Hall of Fame 16 year career.
One law, “If a man has stolen goods from a temple, or house, he shall be put to death; and he that has received the stolen property from him shall be put to death.” This teaches men not to steal. Will a man sacrifice his life for stolen goods? It is possible but highly doubted. But
I understand why he feels the need to take away the guns but it may not be the best option. There should be restrictions about who is able to own, buy, or operate a gun, but we also need guns to protect ourselves. Not everyone is trained how to safely use a gun. I do not believe having weapons is the real cause of what has been happening. So I think we need to address the real cause of why people act the way they do because it is people that kill people not the gun that kills
In general, the police should not divide humans into races because in the future, races that never get accused may start illegal activities and confidentially continue, knowing that the police would accuse another race that is more likely to do it, hence encouraging the downfall of the society. The only solution is for the higher authorities to not divide humans based on skin tone, appearances, or cultures which will eliminate any racist acts similar to the incidents that occurred in Haroon’s
This tend to let the criminal go loose which raises concerns among the society as they are living among with those dangerous criminal and that the police officers have no ways to identify them even if they are able to identify the criminal, they could not put the criminals behind bars. At first crime control model were intended to assist police in getting the criminal. However some police officer had abuse their power given to solve their case quickly which led to miscarriages of justice which can be seen in the previous case. There are also other examples where police have misuse their power that leads to the conviction of innocent society. Situation like this can be seen in cases like Guildford four, Birmingham six, Maguire seven and many more.
As you can see people have some crazy arguments as to why we need gun control like gun control will lower crime rates, less people will die when involved in criminal attacks, and who needs a gun for protection when we have law enforcement for protection. But, these are all clearly pathetic arguments when it comes to swaying the majority. No matter what way they want to look at it, gun control will not work in any