The first step of effective leadership is to recognize the various needs and concerns of the clique and the social network on the job. In the simulation, the manager realizes that it is not so a desirable circumstances of being responsible for the teams that have clearly resisted the leadership. The manager had to resize and restructure the team for the best intentions of the team to understanding the formation and fundamental sub-structures, and their impact on supporting the group thinking towards organizational goals. The success of the leadership was reliant on the leadership style and decisions that utilize the influence of the teams’ behavior and the kind of teams that was chosen to execute those decisions. It is not always likely to sustain a fixed leadership style to deal with change interrelated
Supervisors must be able to make sound and accurate judgments that are the overall best decisions for the company (Supervisor Standards, 2007). These decisions are sometimes needed on the spot. The supervisor must show that they can handle making decisions and show they are able to make the right decision. Employees may not always understand why their supervisor made a certain decision, when this occurs animosity may spread throughout the team. This is why it is important for supervisors to explain their reasons for making a certain decisions.
With Citigroup’s organizational culture it has guided employees toward the behaviors and attitudes that have put the company at risk. The company must revert to what is important that is the customers and focus on the core values of the organizations, and the vision of the organization. To change Citigroup’s organizational culture there needs to be a shared responsibility among the leaders of the company, managers, and employees. By having a shared responsibility will make Citigroup’s organizational culture more effective and productive. Having shared responsibility will allow each employee to achieve or accomplish his or her full potential, and acting with the greatest level integrity when dealing with one another, and customers.
Explain the difference in the influence of managers and leaders on their teams. This would be based very heavily on a person’s leadership style and this is usually gauged through their levels of empathy and how they manage and lead their individual teams see below chart of management styles. Each style would affect the team in different ways and would play to their strengths but may also not be effective for all members of a team this is why it become important to skill mix teams and allow for all areas of experience to be given an opportunity to work together. 2.2. Evaluate the suitability and impact of different leadership styles in different contexts.
In addition, management controls the process as well as providing the path, rules, and resources to reach the companies goal (Kumle, 2006). Roles of Managers and Leaders Some say that the difference between a manager and being a leader is that management is career while leadership is a calling. Being a leader, one has to have a clearly defined convictions and most importantly, the courage of one’s convictions to see them manifest into reality (Kossoff, 2011). Effective leadership skills are developed and refined by time, experience, and a true desire to be more than just a manager, but a true leader. What roles do managers and leaders play in today’s environment?
Leaders have to set the standard by being empathic, supportive and use a range of different leadership styles to develop and maintain the team, they also have be fair and consistent, as workers that feel they are unfairly treated by a manager will not show loyalty and will do the minimum. The leader also has to demonstrate capability and experience, as having workers that are more highly achieving than the leader breeds resentment. Tuckman (1965) described the stages of team development as ‘Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing. As teams travel through these stages trust, respect and understanding of individual’s strengths and tolerance of their weaknesses is established. This process allows individuals to learn about each other personalities, coping strategies and response to pressure, allowing for bonds between members to be formed.
It involves modeling the vision, forming teams, influencing them and aligning people to achieve the set goals. Leadership bears the responsibility of inspiring people and producing meaningful changes in the company. Leadership is therefore responsible for positioning people and organizations in the right positions. A good leader has the ability to articulate a vision and assign the right people the right tasks based on their talents. Leaders motivate their subordinates and in return obtain outstanding results from their employees.
It is important to be able to penetrate any barriers that the employee may have as a defense mechanism. A good manager of people realizes that once you have found an entry point into their employees heart; it is likely that the manager will be successful in motivating the employee. Because people have different personalities not all things goes as planned when you are attempting to motivate your employees. An excerpt from an article on bussinessball.com states: “Developing understanding of personality typology, personality traits, thinking styles and learning styles theories is also a very useful way to improve your knowledge
It also has the disadvantage that employees become dependant on their leader. Persuasive management style involves the manager sharing some characteristics with that of an autocratic manager. The most important aspect of a persuasive manager is that they maintain control over the entire decision making process. The most prominent difference here is that the persuasive manager will spend more time working with their subordinates in order to try to convince them of the benefits of the decisions they have made. A persuasive manager is more aware of the employees but it would be incorrect to say that the style of management is more inclusive of employees.
This will also determine if additional staff is needed or if they may have too many staff. In conclusion, one can see how important the functional roles of the human resource department really are. They provide vital information that can help the organization grow to be the best that it can be by providing the responsibilities of job analysis and design, recruitment and retention, selection and placement, performance appraisal, compensation, and labor management relations