Who (Rome or Athens) has the better citizenship system? Rome had a better citizenship system because foreigners could become Roman citizens, Censors controlled the citizens, and the Roman senate was efficient. In Rome it was easier to become a citizen rather than Athens. The Roman Republic had requirements to become a citizen but they weren't difficult. Free, native-born adult males could become a citizen if his parents were married in a certain part of the Roman empire (Doc.
The Greeks were a democratic society, believing that the power should be given to a group of men instead of only a single leader. The Greek society was a city-state society, meaning that each city, like Athens and Sparta, would operate like an independent nation; each one of them having their own government. The Roman society was first established as a republican society and then later becoming an empire. The Roman republican “Entrusted executive responsibilities to two consuls who wielded civil and military power. Consuls were elected by an assembly dominated by the wealthy classes, known in Rome as the patricians” (Bentley, Ziegler & Streets, 2008, Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History, “The Roman Republic and its
A Spartan's life was centered on the state, because they lived and died to serve the state. Although the competing city-states of Sparta and Athens were individually different as well as governmentally diverse, they both managed to become dominating powers in Ancient Greece. The political power of Athens is based on economic power. Democracy is based on middle class economic power. In slow evolution towards democracy, as their trade increased, Athenian craftsmen and merchants had enough money to purchase their own weapons.
East Meets West By Miguel Vela Period 1 Two major civilizations, Classical Athens in the West and Han China in the East, had many differences but how great were they? Han China and Classical Athens difference was very great not just because of their locations but also at politics, culture and society. Analyzing each civilizations government, cultural aspects and society can help prove why their differences were so great. Han China and Classical Athens governments were extremely different. Han Chinas government was strictly centralized, with an emperor as their supreme and divine ruler; the Son of Heaven.
Greece had Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle. Rome had Marcus Aurelius and Marcus Tullius “Cicero”. Originally Athens had been ruled by kings. Later they held an oligarchy and then held a democracy where the Greek people could vote for their rulers (Gill). In Greece each
), the political and economic differences between them would make one think they were on opposite corners of the globe. Politically Athens formed into the first ever recorded example Democracy, whereas Sparta, though it contained democratic components, was primarily ruled as a Monarchial/Oligarchical society. Economically, Athens position on the coast made it a prime spot for trade with the other City-states of Greece, as well as with foreign lands with whom trade would be impossible otherwise. Athenian Marketplaces, called the Agora, were integral to everyday life for the citizens of Athens. If they weren't merchant class workers who peddled their wares at the Agora, any goods they required would be bought there.
The Romans moved away from the simple, ordered and comparatively humble style of Greek temples and created more lavish, grandiose buildings, made possible by engineering developments such as concrete, arches, vaults and domes, to emulate the epicurean taste, vast wealth and power of the Empire. The two nations had similar approaches to religion and its significance in everyday life but very different ways of producing these religious buildings. The differences between the Greek and the Roman temple are due to the
Differences between Rome and GreeceIn my opinion what are the three most significant differences between Rome and Greece? I believe that their systems of government, religions and people. Although both Rome and Greece shared similarities in many areas like art, architecture and literature which both cultures were proud of. The Greeks were well unified country made up of isolated small farming community evolving into the polis or cities. There growing numbers of two-hundred communities led to the organization of these diverse people which were flexible and very creative.
The Greeks believed that intellect is superior to forces of nature, while the Romans wanted their architecture to dominate the sites. A third similarity was their ability to be innovative during their time periods. Along with their innovations when it came to their temples, the Greeks also had the ability to create very life-like and dynamic sculptures, something that the Romans constantly struggled with during their time. Because of this, a lot of their sculptures were just replicas of Greek sculptures with small adaptations and changes occurring. One of the most innovative steps that the Romans took with their
In this century people recreate the myths in movies and books. The Greek and Norse mythologies were quite different but the basic idea and the structures were sort of similar. Firstly the Greek and Norse were from totally different sides of the world and had completely different cultures. On the Norse side you have all the Northern countries that ranged from a lot of different backgrounds, In contrast the Greek were once considered the world's greatest country. The Norse had a difficult time, due to the climate.