At long last, justice may come to hoons who kill Lainie Anderson’s opinion article ‘At long last, justice may come to hoons who kill’ contends that the hoon drivers are merely getting ‘a slap on the wrist’ they aren’t paying the price for unacceptable behaviour. The vindictive tone earlier on in the piece demonstrated at the started stating to the reader that the book plays not everything. The writer’s intention is to prompt awareness about anti social driving and the lack of consequences reprisal. The heading of the article grabs attentions, sparking room for thought; ‘justice’ the word cleverly used stating an underlying message that Australian laws do not bring justice. ‘Hoons who kill’ encourages the reader to recognise the prominence of the issue.
Courier Mail Prime Time for Crime Editor From glitz and glamour to gangs, guns and graphitii. The Gold Coast is certainly making a name for itself with increasing violence and vandalism tarnishing the once ‘family friendly’ destination. Almost every day we hear of the darker reality of drugs, guns and violent crime. But seldom do we hear about the good occurring in the community. Constant presentations over time of negative events, such as stabbings, fatal shootings and drug related activities have assisted in marring the Gold Coast’s reputation.
It is this sustained challenge presented by the global SlutWalks that ensures its place among social movements (Tilly, 2003). The challenge presented by the SlutWalk campaigns is direct. The movement essentially kick stared by a statement by a policeman. This comment could have easily remained unheard and disregarded. Left as just another misogynistic belief embedded in the fabric of society.
Banksy is a graffiti artist based out of Bristol, UK. His real name is currently unknown. He began as a freehand graffiti artist; he incorporated stencils into his freehand work and once he found out that stenciling was a lot faster than freehand he decided to switch over to doing mainly stencils. His artwork is humorous, anti-war, anti-capitalism, and very satirical. His images usually contain children, old people, soldiers, rats, and monkeys.
When human beings castigate authors of America’s past on a cool autumns day (Chronographia), they are condemning the olden days itself. How can humanity try to discredit the authors without additionally discrediting the olden days they document? One of the crystal clear actions in this tale is when young Washington's hacking goes unseen. For what reason doe the haters have to want to discredit it? An individual may remark, "The plantations slaves would have noticed his hacking."
Although Lawrence does make his point that racial speech can be hurtful and can even provoke violence, he lacks in convincing the reader that there is any legitimate way to regulate it. With the way Lawrence presents himself, it is difficult to see passed his obvious personal feelings on the matter. He speaks often of his concern for the victims and not enough about how racial speech could successfully regulated. I think Lawrence is also more emotionally focused on getting the reader to “acknowledge that there is real harm inflicted by
Critical Analysis on “The Missing Piece to the Gang-Violence Debate.” Dan Gardner’s publish, “The Missing Piece to the Gang-Violence Debate”, is strongly controversial in his position against increasing enforcement of drug laws, and boosting penalties for violators. He believes that you should actually limit enforcement and hardship of sentencing when it comes to drugs. Was his argument persuasive enough in the essay to actually influence his wishes into society? Personally, I don’t think so. Gardner’s ideas are too drastic and I believe he didn’t have enough support in his argument that his plans would actually decrease the murders in gang violence.
Primarily, it is clearly geared towards its receiving audience, namely well-to-do traditional American families. As a result, it definitely holds a biased position that requires it to appeal to its readers and pander to popular opinions beyond simply informing the general public of newsworthy events regarding the war. The second document also exhibits bias, although of a completely different sort. This underground newspaper promotes radically different, liberal, anti-war ideas and is obviously not geared towards ameliorating its professional image or really pandering to its audience. Its unofficial status makes it less put together while perhaps ensuring greater freedom of information.
Even though Tribe is considered a bomber-tagger she shows there is more to spray painted walls than meets-the-eye. One could argue; not all forms of tagging should be considered negative and dangerous. If you keep an open mind
Boeckmann (2002) writes, “ The collective focus on hate crime and hate speech articulated in these articles incorporates nuances that go beyond the FBI’s definition” (p. 208). The definition does not account for elements like prejudice against a victim based upon an assessment of contrast or oddness important to the culprit. The disparity is motivated by a number of prestigious characteristics viewed extremely unwelcoming by the culprit; hence, the result is the violent act. Sadly, hate crimes stems from the beauty of differences in ethnicities, races, beliefs, cultures, and class