Globalisation And Globalization

1978 Words8 Pages
Many tendencies appeared when asking this question, and it is important to emphasise the fact that the answer to this question varies in function of the interlocutor, mainly due to the fact that the term 'globalisation' itself is rather broad and subjective. Two main tendencies are showing up; the Hyperglobalists and the Skeptics. To Hyperglobalists (such as Scholte and Ohmae), the state’s power is being altered by non-state actors (McGrew, 2008).They hold a pessimistic view and argue that globalisation is diminishing the sovereign state by undermining the ability of governments to control their people, their own economics and societies. The most relevant issue is the increase in technology and the declining power of the state through media…show more content…
Globalisation referred as “ an intensification of cross-border interactions and interdependence between countries”1 brings the idea of interdependence in the equation. Instead of having nation states seen as separated entities, the process of globalisation brought those nations together and created interdependence which entirely redrew the international system. We move from a side by side existence of individual states to an integration of those states inside an international system where they depend on each other. Which also means that if something happens outside their territory they will be more likely to have repercussions on them, that would not have been the case a century…show more content…
The Skeptics argue that despite the increasing development of globalization, the state has not diminished. Academic such as Hirst, Gildpin and Krasner argue that 'states and geopolitics remain the principal agents and forces shaping world order today'7 . The state is not being undermined even if its role has changed. They even go further, stating “that globalization is largely a myth that disguises the reality of the existence of powerful sovereign states8 and major economic divisions in the world. National governments remain in control of their domestic economies as well as the regulation of international economic activities”9. Even if the position of the state is weakening, it still have an hold on domestic power. Moreover, for international treaties to be implemented, they need to be signed and delivered by the state, internationally and domestically. Therefore the state still has power and is, according to Hirst, “ a key actor in globalization in relation to global governance and
Open Document