Social Factors Affecting the Delivery of Healthcare Social Factors Affecting the Delivery of Healthcare Access to care can be defined as the ability to obtain needed, affordable, convenient, acceptable, and effective person health services in a timely manner (Shi & Singh, 2010). In regards to the health care delivery system in America, one would be ignorant to believe that everybody has equal and parallel access and utilization of our health care system. Significant inequalities in health care and status exist across varying income groups, social classes, and ethnic groups. Due to these inequalities in health status, major challenges are facing the distribution of health care among certain groups, if not all, Americans. In order to improve the nation’s health and end the disproportion in health care to vulnerable populations, the social determinants of health must be addressed foremost in order to achieve an understanding of the issues that are affecting so many Americans and what must be done in the fight toward equality in the U.S. health care delivery system.
In order to provide free education for medical students, malpractice insurance for physicians, and free health care for everyone, taxes need to be raised. Ultimately, all Americans can have health care if we pay higher taxes instead of paying the insurance companies. Bibliography 1. Karen Davis, Cathy Schoen, & Kristof Stremikis, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally 2010, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2010/Jun/1400_Davis_Mirror_Mirror_on_the_wall_2010.pdf. 2.
The rising cost of health care has cause the government to step in and control regulations and spending; thus creating a health care reform system. America is now entering into this reform. The purpose of having a universal health care system is to provide covered care for all its residence, dispel misnomers about the program, and America's health care system, before Obama Care, was organized around private insurance companies, which many of our citizens could not afford. With the new Obama health care system, everyone pays into the system and everyone receives care. Just like Britain's health care system, they provides free public healthcare to all permanent residents at the point of need.
The Competitive Market Model and U.S. Health Care Pharmaceuticals Government involvement and its pros and cons Pharmaceuticals plays a key role in health care, with health care being a social right it proposes government to be involved in the drug markets. States are responsible for maintaining the product safety, quality, efficacy, and keeping health costs fair to the society. Price consideration may be under government intervention. When government intervenes in pricing, it sets a standard price for the drug throughout the country so that everyone can have equitable access to these medications. This also includes the affordability range, and it stops unnecessary consumption, limits price growth to avoid excess societal burden.
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
Reflection Journal: Cost/benefit of Sustaining Life Social and Organizational Issues in Healthcare Southern New Hampshire University Written by: Pratikkumar Patel The economic evaluation of health and environmental interventions for sustaining a life is becoming increasingly important. In the light of limited funding, such evaluations can provide an important tool to demonstrate the economic return of investments in intervention, compare the effectiveness of one intervention against another and help policy-makers allocate their limited budget. As I see my career as a Healthcare Administrator, it is important for me to know method of economic evaluation that values all benefits against all costs. The resulting cost-benefit ratio gives an indication of whether or not the benefits outweigh the costs of an intervention, and hence provides a decision-making tool with a broad societal perspective. In this journal, I will be reflecting about how insurance companies, hospitals, and patients can use Cost-benefit analysis for sustaining a life.
6), financing is critically essential to acquire health protection or to pay for health benefits. In the private segment, the financing of social insurance benefits for people is ordinarily inferred from their managers who frequently pay in part for such protection in the type of edge profits. Workers are additionally given a chance to include different parts of their families to this sort of boss based protection. As explained by Barton (2010, p.177), private protection is evaluated to blanket in the vicinity of 67 percent of the nonelderly populace and explains 54% of the incomes sources. It is vital to note that generally, the equalization between open and private wellsprings of medicinal services financing has updated breathtakingly in the most recent some decades (Barton, 2010, p. 178).
"PUBLIC- AND PRIVATE-SECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH-CARE SYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF OECD COUNTRIES. "[->0] There are different system types, which can have a positive affect when implemented and utilized to the fullest potential(s). 1. Single payer: Government funded insurance that pays for all health care expenses except for co-pays and coinsurance. 2.
Article Write Up: Pros and Cons of Universal Health Care In this article the pros and cons of universal health care are described with great detail. Universal health care is health care that is subsidized by the government; another name for it is “single-payer” health care. This form of health care is offered in most countries to all its citizens. The advantages of universal health care is it gives people that can not afford health care the health care services they are in need of. In the instance of universal health care, the plan covers everyone, mostly for people who have a hard time finding health care.
When we examine the issue it mostly focuses on the people to people interactions; which in most cases are physician to patient, the entire health care system, and the health care policies defined by the government (Lawrence R. Wu, 001). The thought of economics is made up of scarcity and the lack thereof and in the health care field there is plenty of that to go around. In which someone (someone being the government) has to govern the goods and services provided along with the quantity and how to allocate them to the economy. Right now there is a huge debate whether or not we as Americans should endorse the Obama Health Care plan which provides equal health care for all. Obama Care is all about fixing some of the flaws we have in our health care system, and making health care affordable for the public.