Firstly, in order to acquire the power economically, Gandhi utilized a spinning wheel and the traditional clothes of India to address their citizens not to purchase western clothes, which greatly contributes to Britain economy. In contrast with that, Mao did not fight against the government. He just simply reaped a lot of advocate by giving the lands to peasants, whose lands were taken away by the land owners, therefore they sank into poverty. Secondly, in order to make each of their countries better socially, Mao and Gandhi did the same sort of things. Gandhi was desperate to get rid of caste system, whereas Mao wanted to discard the Confucianism system.
By the early 1920’s Congress had become a political party with a mass appeal and a following of millions throughout India. It had sharpened its ideals and it was decided that co-operation with the Raj was to end and be replaced by non-violent non-cooperation. Demands were tightly focussed on Independence and the Raj could not afford to ignore this anymore. This nationalist force had come about as a result of Gandhi. The idea of self-sufficient rural communities caught on and the Indian peasant masses began to take notice of Gandhi and see him as someone whose ideas they could identify with.
He made sure that the party was open to all. The party had leadership but only so that a discipline could be maintained. Overall, the party was transformed and had large national followers. Leadership style and features of Mahatma Gandhi Gandhi as a Charismatic leader He had the ability to encourage people to follow him in large crowds. In South Africa, he encouraged his Indian followers to defy laws that were designed to oppress them, by using non-violent civil disobedience.
Even if they do they're community will shun them and treat them like the colored. So they have no choice, but to shun them. This image shows the bravery and courage of the colored who wanted equal rights and freedom of
Civil Rights This was a brilliant public relations strategy in action, for every time the protestors were shown on the news, it was them acting peacefully and a white mob attacking them. These images alone helped to win over many supporters and force the national government to step in to help the cause of civil rights. One of the main goals of the passive resistors was to gain public support and force the government to uphold the Supreme Courts controversial rulings, such as what happened with Central High School when President Kennedy nationalized the Arkansas National Guard and the Interstate Commerce Comm. forced the desegregation of the interstate bus lines. Without lifting a finger they changed the way the nation was run.
However, in Fahrenheit 451 Beatty describes conformity as a positive aspect of society – he argues that conformity in behavior prevents violence and jealousy by restricting the gifted and talented people from their ability to excel, which is good in a way because then the others won‘t feel bad. However, the real problem in the situation Beatty describes is not the exceptionally bright child (when he is trying to show Montag the uselessness of books) but the group of people of those who submit to it. Unfortunately, this very situation occurs repeatedly in our society today. People who choose not to conform may be persecuted by the groups of people who submit into censorship, and through that act of persecution the people reinforce conformity of
Gandhi was a man that would “strain every nerve to make Truth and Non-violence accepted in all our national activities” (i.e. Gandhi, 358). He believed that if India could get out of control and show the world that progress could be made, he would show other nations that they too, could gain their own power as a self governed nation. Gandhi and Marx would agree on terms of having self governing nations because Marx’s main goal was Communism. While Marx thought that strength in numbers mattered and how many Proletariats could take down the Bourgeois class, Gandhi believed that “strength does not come from physical capacity” (i.e.
What part did the Wall Street Crash play in Hitler’s rise to power? In 1928, the Nazis won 12 of the 491 seats in the Reichstag. 40% of all factory workers in Germany were unemployed in 1932. Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor in January 1933. Do you think that Nazi Government propaganda succeeded in influencing the behaviour of young people in Germany in the period 1933-39?
Melissa Hughes W131 22320 Comparative Analysis Rough Draft Obedience to Authority Obedience is the state, fact, or instance of obeying, or a willingness to obey; submission. Most people do not think about obedience as much more than doing what they are told; they do not try to see what the outcome of their actions; they unconsciously comply. Blind obedience to authority can be defined as what people do when they think laws should be obeyed just because the law exists. Such unconscious failure to think about their actions “because we have always done it this way”; “because my boss said so”; “because it’s the law”; “because I was only following orders”; leads them to commit morally corrupt acts. They commit these acts believing that they are doing nothing wrong because they are following the law.
Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when we ourselves lack the courage to say it? The question about whether heroes should be depicted as people who say what they think when others lack the courage to say it has triggered an intense controversy throughout the world. Admittedly, the majority of people are content to go through their life following the crowd. Thus, from my perspective, the genuinely heroes are those who hold their dauntless courage to strive for morality and follow their hearts when the public is full of cowards. A true Indian hero, Mahatma Gandhi voiced his opinions about non-violent means of achieving freedom when others lacked the courage to express similar ideas.