However the cooperation cannot be smoothly all the time, whereas ideas and the way of communicating of men and women differ significantly. This could be crucial for work related results, because tensions are never effective in the workplace. This paper will review the communication way of men and women in the work place as a manager and discussed which communication way has a better influence eventually on the results of an organization. 3. Research Design 3.1 Central research question ‘Which gender type has a better influence as a manager on the results of an organization, taking in consideration the language use?’ 3.2 Sub questions 1.
In this paper, I will argue for Butler’s view on how certain gender performance is restricted in these numerous fields, and how Ms. Butler would object to these various situations. In the opening statement of Gender Trouble, Butler states, “feminist theory has assumed that there is some existing identity, understood through the category of women, who initiates feminist interests and goals.” (CITE GENDER TROUBLE PAGE 1 HERE) By this quote, she explains that feminist theory created the problem that it represents, while at the same time preventing its own progression. She supports this claim with her primary example of gender restriction in the field of representation in politics. Although this problem has no surefire resolution, it is suggested that in order for women to have true political visibility, the development of an identity that truly represents one as an individual is key. Butler suggests the following theory as a solution to these multifaceted complications.
The normal characteristics that relate to femininity are softness and tenderness, prompting society to perceive a delusional falsehood that women are weak, unable to defend themselves. In a normal world it is accepted that muscular capabilities of men and beauty regimes of woman are not prone to change because these traits are usually inborn and/or developed. This avenue of thought is simply untrue. Experience has shown society that females can often match the male when it comes to living with and understanding pressure; men have fallen short when it comes to dealing with more pressure than their female counterparts. Gender roles continue to change as this is how individuals develop over a given period of time.
Given the listed characteristics of what a leader is, the question that is frequently pondered is, are women or men better leaders? Which gender has the qualities necessary to influence employees to accomplish the organization’s goals?
For example, while.males are aggressive, strong, instrumental, etc., females are weak, submissive, affective, nurturant, etc. Sex differences in power and in social participation are conceptualized as consequences of these inherent differences between the sexes. When the emphasis is placed upon society, persons are viewed as empty slates, the product of the socialization process which integrates them into a
Chemers M (1997) showed that leadership has been described as the "process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of common tasks". As a result it might have significant influences to the efforts and motivation of employees on their working performance. In addition, leadership can build; influence and changing the organizational culture and it might contribute to the establishment of the organizational culture. One of the primary responsibilities of strategic leader is to create working
Gender roles refer to the set of social and behavioral rules that are considered to be socially appropriate for individuals of a specific sex in the context of a specific culture, which differ widely between cultures. There are different opinions as to whether observed gender differences in behavior and personality characteristics are, at least in part, due to cultural or social factors, and therefore, the product of socialization experiences, or they are due to biological and physiological differences. Views on gender-based differentiation in the workplace and in interpersonal relationships have often undergone profound changes as a result of feminist and/or economic influences, but there are still considerable differences in gender roles in almost all societies. It is also true that in times of necessity, such as during a war or other emergency, women are permitted to perform functions which in "normal" times would be considered a male role, or vice versa. Gender is used to describe those
The conversational rituals common among women are often ways of “maintaining an appearance of equality, taking into account the effort of the exchange on the other person, using up effort to downplay the speaker’s authority so they can get the job done without flexing their muscles in an obvious way.” Women use conversational strategies to avoid appearing conceited and take another person’s feelings into account. They may seem less confident and competent than they really are. Both us men and women feel often that they aren’t getting enough credit for what they have done, not being listened to, and aren’t getting ahead as fast as they should. Every individual has his or her own style. “Women are more likely to downplay their certainty and learned as they were growing up that sounding too sure of themselves will make them unpopular.
You don’t need a special word for it.” The existence of this word and the lack of a female counterpart reflect the perception of women in the culture of male college freshmen. Men are perceived as more powerful orators and are often considered more authoritative in their speech. Women are seen that their language use is more garrulous, frivolous an illiterate (Holmes 162). Again we
An example of that, would be critic Diane K. Lewis’s thought, on how black women may be more like white men in terms of familial and economic roles, like black men in terms of their relationships with whites, and like women in terms of their relationships with men. 4. To properly understand gender studies, we must realize that one purpose of gender criticism is to criticize gender as we commonly conceive of it, to expose its insufficiency and inadequacy.