Functionalist View of Education and Social Strata

1258 Words6 Pages
What are the perspectives of functional theory of social stratification for minorities in the economic future of the U.S. In understanding the significance of social stratification a scientific analysis of several questions first being statement of the problem. Next a hypothesis followed by the debate of functional versus conflict theory perspectives as the experiment. Leading to the results that affirm or disaffirm the hypothesis. Lastly, conclusions of the resulting observation. First Question: How Functionalism effects minorities in society? First understanding social stratification and functionalism. Functionalism makes the assumption that a society is based on the population taking on the roles necessary to balance the needs of the participants. In terms of social stratification, this suggests that there are various classes of people necessary to balance society (Giddens, 1990). Some will be laborers others managers or leaders. Some will be at the lower levels of society while others will achieve the highest levels of middle levels of in society. Consider the most prevalent reason why minority students need to complete their higher education. The lack of realization of any roadblock that hinders the success of students in graduating or gaining a proper education can create an imbalance in the productivity and advancement of society. A functionalist perspective would consider a problem exists in higher education could result in a malfunction within the sociological institution (Giddens, 1990). Under the scientific method a hypothesis based on this functionalist view may be: This malfunction can be corrected when there is a functioning society where the various foundational infrastructural components can work cohesively to bring about a state of equilibrium within the society (Giddens, 1990). The functions that are required in the U.S. for example are
Open Document