Freudian vs. Jung

469 Words2 Pages
Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud may have shared similar ideas, concepts or theories in regards to their views on people, but they also had differing thoughts on the subject as well. Jung, as well as Freud, spoke about concepts such as the psyche, and the ego and also provided insight into the area of consciousness and unconsciousness. While Jung and Freud may have written about similar concepts, their definitions for each concept were clearly different. Jung literally replaced each of Freud's definitions with his own theories and beliefs. Specifically their theories in regards to dream content were very different than one another. Jung also believed that an individual's functions, both psychological and physical, was characterized more in terms of purpose, and was therefore more teleological than Freud had believed. Freud interpreted dreams from the causal point of view. He searched for a cause of dreams and figured out that dreams are merely the answers on internal stimuli. When interpreting dreams, he found out that internal stimuli are unsatisfied wishes, which are in most cases conflicting in nature. He would take typical dreams, such as dreams of nakedness that causes the dreamer to have feelings of shame and embarrassment, and analyzes this shame as a “paradise [where] men are naked and unashamed, until the moment arrives when shame and fear awaken; expulsion follows, and sexual life and cultural development begin.’ On the other hand, Jung did not only search for the cause of dream, he interpreted dreams from the standpoint of finality. He claimed that dream, as any other psychological phenomenon, has its purpose. “Many people who know something, but not enough, about dreams and their meaning, and who are impressed by their delicate and apparently intentional compensation, are liable to succumb to the prejudice that the dream actually has a moral purpose, that it
Open Document