We must be sure that finding those answers are done ethically from the crime scene to trial. The Investigator Ethical Considerations From the moment the investigator gets a case professionalism, knowledge of laws and procedure is what has to be followed. If at any time the investigator became biased and used emotion instead of just facts of the case could be compromised. Remaining unbiased in either homicide or rape can be extremely difficult for even the most ethical investigators. Handling evidence properly is one of the most crucial points of any investigation.
It is usually recommended that any career use honesty as a quality, but it is extremely important that criminal justice professionals have honesty as well. Law enforcement is occasionally known for being corrupt, and it is so important for our law enforcement officers to be truthful on all applications, reports, and everyday work. This provides for more efficient and trustworthy public servants. The most important reason for honesty is simply to ensure that the innocent stay that way and are not caught in the lies of the accusers. Criminal justice professionals play an important role in the court system, and if they lie on accusations and evidence, the innocent become victims of the dishonesty.
However, with the “due process an individual is allowed their day in court if suspected of a crime because of United States constitution. Therefore giving that individual a right to a fair trial with an option for a jury of his or hers peers. It is the responsibility of the courts system to provide strong evidence on an individual accused of committing a crime beyond reasonable doubt. Strong evidence is important to avoid sending an individual to prison if they are innocent (Siegel, J. L.,
With this model, there is no second chance. The due process model focuses on individual liberties and rights and is concerned with limiting the powers of government. The focus is on the accused and on his or her rights. The focus is also on providing some balance to the power and authority of the state. Due process protections under the Constitution force the state to fulfill its burden of proving its case against the accused.
It is important to the criminal justice system because a client should always have adequate representation. The issues that surround attorney-client privilege also make it very important to the court system. Some of the issues that exist because of the complexity of privilege are mainly questions such as in what instances should an attorney break that privilege, what if a client admits guilt of a crime, what about a client that conveys their intent to commit a crime. Admitting guilt of a crime that has already occurred is considered privileged information, however, a client that conveys their intent to commit a crime is not covered under the attorney-client privilege. It is an attorney’s obligation, in fact, to break that attorney-client privilege in order to prevent future harm (Meyer & Grant, 2003).
When misconduct or mistakes are made it can have very damaging effects on individuals and their lives, but also to the credibility of the criminal justice system. This can happen and does on occasion (Meyer & Grant, 2003). How can we improve consistency in how prosecutors accept case work? When assessing possible improvements to the consistency of how prosecutors accept case work, there are no simple answers. Putting strict demands on what a prosecutor
A situation may lender an innocent suspect guilty. Many suspects would seek a go ahead with self-representation rather than acquiring an unreliable defense from a corrupt lawyer. The role of attorneys in the criminal justice system as it applies to right to counsel In the most sensitive court proceedings such as confirmation of charges, trial, and appeal, a suspect will have legal assistance by a court. The attorney will assist the suspect who does not have ability to afford hiring his or her attorney. The lawyer should fully represent the suspect fairly without discrimination or any nature as religious beliefs, nationality, and color among other aspects.
In contrast, the due process model emphasizes "protecting the rights of the accused through formal, legal restraints on the police, courts, and corrections" (Gaines). Under the due process model, the same case would face would be put under a microscope and carefully examined; every piece of evidence, every witness testimony would be scrutinized in order to ensure a fair trial is delivered. The due process is more beneficial to the criminal justice system because it protects everyone's rights equally by regulating the police and courts. The due process model is what separates
The person who allegedly committed the crime has just as many rights as the victim, and their rights start the moment the arrest is made. The Due Process is a process designed to “guarantee all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or property” (Due Process of Law. (n.d.)). People who are in jeopardy of becoming incarcerated for either a short of long period of time are entitled to legal protections such as: a right to an attorney and a trial by a jury of peers. It is services like this that help provide due process of law.
I am going to choose the fifth amendment of the constitution of the U.S., because it is used quit often by criminals. The way the Fifth Amendment works; when people are arrested by any law enforcement agency for any crime committed, they have the right to remain silent when interrogated by the detectives, because any statement made can be used as evidence against them, and during the interrogation it is recommended to have an attorney present and if you can’t afford an attorney, the court will appoint one to make sure that the suspects rights are not being violated (Mallor, J., 2013, p. 153).The Fifth Amendment pretty much protects people against compelled testimonial self-incrimination by establishing that no person will be forced to make a statement against himself (Mallor, J., 2013,