Frederick Street Analysis

2335 Words10 Pages
Frederick Street: Life and Death on Canada’s Love Canal State-Sponsored Crime “Economic gains should never be an excuse for knowingly poisoning workers and their communities” (Kuyek, 2004:2), is just one of many examples of officials using profit as a means for pollution. Because of the resistance of powerful corporate and government organizations to valuing the health of employees and citizens above the making of profit leads those officials to overlook regulations, push constructions and lobby surrounding neighbourhoods to the ‘good’ of economic growth, while in the same breadth marginalizing their decisions for harmful effects. Officials typically placed hazardous waste sites, coke plants, steel mills and the likes near poor or minority communities because they expected less opposition than if the site were located near a well-off community. Social analysis must take place if we are to ask questions and learn about how our decisions to either welcome or reject such ‘prosperities’ are genuine and how issues may be interlinked. Using our sociological imagination could broaden our view of state-sponsored crimes and give insight as to how our personal troubles may be in the future interlinked with public issues. Frederick Street is…show more content…
Along with JAG, however came the red tape (Barlow, May, 2000:95). It was not long until JAG would essentially be paralyzed with health studies and overwhelming public pressure. The people of Frederick Street soon built their own coalition, called Act for a Healthy Sydney. The extent to which locals were involved in the activism and research to push along such a gut wrenchingly slow cleanup is evident (Barlow, May, 2000:98). Act! involved those from the community and many canvassed neighbors and friends to gather evidence essentially for disposition in JAG and for Act! to use in their
Open Document