I think that overall they have been very successful since they are doing questioning to accommodate their best interest for a juror that has the best credibility. Is this considered jury tampering? No, this is not jury tampering. Jury tampering is an offense in which someone unduly or illegally tries to influence a jury's composition or the decision that it comes to in a trial. It is not considered jury tampering because the prosecution and defense attorneys have the right to know the credibility of the person that would be deciding the fate of the defendant.
Juries can sense truth behind the verdict, but judge has to see point of law and put his decision within the boundaries of law. The juror is a sensible layman and representative of society, so society will accept his decision. Juries ensure that the legal system remains easily understandable to the ordinary person; evidence has to be clear and without use of difficult legal terminology. Juries being non-legal person not familiar with hardcore law-language. Lawyers have
‘Natural Law has no serious weaknesses.’ Discuss. The natural law theory is approach from an absolutist point of view which expresses that morality is set from birth. What is right and wrong, good or evil can be perceived almost instantly by everyone because morality is universal it is not a relativist thing that can change with situation. Also, natural law does not adjust to public opinion; it is an invisible measure which never changes. It can be seen as a good approach to morality as it does not allow people from different denominations such as cultures or where you are born or in different situation they may find themselves to build their own moral rules and framework to life, it is personal but is guided by these innate rules.
They also believed that serenity comes to those whose will is in according with the World reason, the Logos. This type of thinking leads to reduction of frustration and anxiety. 5. What is the disinterested rational will, and why is it important to Stoic doctrine? Disinterested rational Will is a matter of having no personal attachments or motives.
This positions the reader to agree with the writer because evidence is fact. The reader is generally predisposed to accept evidence is true. Swan uses the word ‘independent’ to demonstrate that Hawthorne is not with the ACT, he stands alone. It is persuasive because he is not associated with the ACT, it is his own professional opinion. Swan demonstrates inclusive
When the case is proceeding, I sat down and took the notes about the conversation between defendant and judge. I found this kind of open court is so fair and judge could not make any preference on defendant or plaintiff, because everybody is listening. Moreover, I thought everyone should abide by contract, if I had the contract with everybody in the business or something, I should abide by, if I breached the rule of law, then I should pay the compensation. Besides this, I felt that I am one member of the country, and I have the right to protect myself and use law to protect my own rights, therefore in the future, when I graduated from the university, if I did the business and had the contract with any party, I knew how to use the knowledge and skills which I learned from my experience of the court to protect myself and others. I learned that violence could not make things better, the violence only could made things worse.
Using this analogy of the criminal or civil court makes it easy to understand that philosophical arguments are not meant to become court room brawls. Respectful demeanor is expected of all those involved and at all times. Intimidation or threats of physical force are out of the question in these circumstances. Even though emotional investments on the sides may be strong to let emotion over come reason would not work in one’s favor. Contempt of court would be a judgment made of any violation of the court’s rules and
Parts of the medieval court system which are still used in our American court system today Open-door policy The notion that our system is better because law and order happens behind closed doors especially needs to be challenged,There is a real downside to keeping those who are punished out of the public eye—we often have no idea how they are being treated most medieval communities lacking any proper policing, crime prevention was trusted in the hands of the village common-folk. There was no reason—or means—for punishment to be any different, say experts. "Punishments therefore had to be simple and generally seen to be fair," according to the online exhibitions of the United Kingdom's National Archives. "Fierce, physical mutilation common in earlier periods, was now rarely used. "Though murderers were often executed, the majority of lesser medieval offenses were punished by shaming the criminal publicly, according to Carrel.
The right to represent your constituent has no government influence or interference; this allows the MP to focus entirely on the good of his constituency and the people within that area. MP’s are free to vote any way they wish on legislation. The government uses their whips to exercise influence on the way their party members vote, but MP’s are able to defy the whips and vote for what he/she truly believes in. In some instances, it’s acceptable to vote against 3-lined whip legislation, but this is only acceptable if it’s against religion. There are certain MP’s that vote against their party’s instructions with no good reason.
At first glance, it appears that the Houyhnhnms have successfully achieved a perfectly governed and structured society. However, as Swift opens up and examines the Houyhnhnm’s actions and beliefs, he exposes the irony of their hegemonic society that prevents them from achieving utopia. The Houyhnhnm society, when looked at upon the surface, is clearly strong, stable, and fair. The Houyhnhnms believe that nothing should be done in excess, and that benevolence to all of their own kind is the key to sucess. They believe that there is no such thing as an opinion, because no creature can proclaim a statement to be true, so all they trust is truth and fact.