In each case, the court ruled against suppressing the evidence. However the Michigan Supreme Court reversed, relying on Terry v. Ohio. The Supreme Court ruled that the search violated the fourth amendment, and the illegal “fruit” (marijuana) should be discarded. The protective search of the passenger compartment of respondent's car was reasonable under the principles articulated in Terry and other decisions of this Court. Protection of police and others can justify protective searches when police have a reasonable belief that the suspect poses a danger.
The key facts are that the two police officers were there for about 5 to 15 minutes. One of the officers smelled the marijuana himself. The detective then went and applied for a search warrant, which was granted. The police then went to Jardines house and found that it was a grow house and Jardines was arrested. Jardines is saying that it is unconstitutional for a drug-sniffing dog to sniff at his front porch and that all the evidence is impermissible now.
However, she found a residence that was also under prior investigation as a narcotics-trafficking by following the truck from Greenwood place. Stracner asked the local garbage man to collect the plastic bags left at the curbs at Greenwoods. On April 6, 1984, she searched through the rubbish, where she found indications of items that were being used to do illegal drugs. This evidence found in Greenwood’s garbage bags, was cited in an affidavit in support of a warrant to search the home of Greenwood. Later that day police found both respondents at Greenwood's in which large quantities of cocaine and hashish.
Is an obligation of a contracting party. Failure to satisfy a duty constitutes a breach of contract and allows the other party to sue for damages caused by the breach. No, Dan did not breach the contract since he delivered to Bob on Friday morning ten AKC certified male black Labrador retriever puppies as the signed contract required. 2. Did Bob breach the contract: YES or NO and Explain why If yes, was the breach major or minor?
Fourth Amendment Rights and Terry Stop Kathy Thomas CJL 2134 Criminal Procedure and the Constitution November 03, 2012 Do an Internet search and find a criminal procedure case that relies on the precedent set in Terry v. Ohio. Thoroughly explain the case and state exactly what the court in the case stated about Terry v. Ohio. The case must specifically cite Terry v. Ohio. Illinois v. Wardlow The defendant William Wardlow was stopped and frisked after looking at two police officers and then running from them in an area known for drugs and trafficking. The defendant was acting nervous with an evasive behavior and he was in a high crime area.
The first general standard states the following: The Smackey Dog Food, Inc. has many remote locations that are not properly managed by the company. Keller CPA might need to seek the assistance of a specialist in this industry because they had never audited a client of this nature. UNDERSTAND THE CLIENT’S BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY – Understanding of the client’s business and industry and knowledge about the company’s operations are essential for the auditor to conduct an adequate audit. Per the 2nd standard of field work: “The auditor must obtain a sufficient understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud, and to design the nature, timing, and extent of
C.A. No C41782 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ST. MICHAEL’S COLLEGE SCHOOL B E T W E E N : HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent - and - J.F. Applicant/Appellant ________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S FACTUM ________________________________________________________ J.R Associates – Attorney at Law 21 McCutcheon Ave Nobleton, Ontario L0G 1N0 Jack Ranson Of Counsel for the Jack Ranson PART I: STATEMENT OF THE CASE This case is about search and seizure. J.F had an ounce of marijuana at school. The police dog was brought in for a ‘sniff’ around and the police now wish to charge J.F with possession at the least.
For instance a trash can was place on the street for trash pick-up and a police walking the beat and he notice that noise was coming from the can and decided to investigate and found live puppies in the trash can along with some mail with the address on it. The police had probable cause to search the trash can and a warrant wasn’t needed to do. Curtilage is protected under the Fourth Amendment and must follow specific guidelines, which means authorities must have a search warrant. For instances the police remove items from Mr. Peabody porch without a warrant. They proceeded to arrest Mr. Peabody, the judge dismisses the case because the police did not follow the Fourth amendment to get a warrant before they search and seize the owner property.
Essay #1 The article “Kyllo v. United States: Technology v. Individual Privacy” by Thomas D. Colbridge is to inform us about the balance between individuals privacy and the government enforcing laws to give safety to the public. It is about the use of thermal imaging technology by the police in the case of Kyllo which goes against his Fourth Amendment which protects him against unreasonable searches and seizures. Since the search was unreasonable and it was never defined in the constitution, it needs much more interpretation for the case. The Kyllo Case essentially is the use of thermal imaging law enforcement used to find out indoor marijuana growing operations in Kyllo’s property. But in the end when it reached the Supreme Court the third time and was ruled that Kyllo was indeed under the protection of the Fourth Amendment.
But as mentioned before here is when the problem comes, Florida drivers and SunPass users have recently been receiving bills when they are not supposed to. Receiving bills is not the worst part, but getting a notice in the mail stating that their licenses are about to be suspended due to a toll violation and with no time to appeal this statement because their driving privileges are at risk. A solution to the problem would be if these three state agencies consolidate into one itself and handle the SunPass accounts, the toll by plate and the toll violations all at once. Is understandable that if the battery of the transponder attached to the vehicle is low it may not transmit the signal to the toll booth, but if the state agencies would work together this issue wouldn’t happen. They would be able to look up each license plate before issuing a bill and if the driver is a SunPass account holder and the license plate is registered under a transponder that matches the driver’s information then they can just deduct the payment from the SunPass account in which the account holder has the option of manual or automatic replenishment which consist on deducting a specific amount of money from a bank account or credit card once the balance on the transponder gets to a low limit,