Break Breaker Inc. to some extent obey with some legal rules, but failed to comply with principles of morality and community, contribute to the society by producing honest high quality services, and account the consequence of damaging their reputation. I think that Solomon’s argument is fairly accurate, but everyone’s views are different on this. Some actions may be acceptable to some but unacceptable to others. Ethics provides the bigger picture in the business life and it must be understood. In my opinion, nothing is more dangerous to a business than a bad public image caused by being unethical.
Lisa should also try and negotiate as to which competitive products they must not do business with. Maybe Troy would be happy if his 3 biggest competitiors lef; but the remaining companies got to stay. Scenario 3: 1. Based on the scenario Ben is not acting illegally because there is no contract that states Coastal Products has to use Southeastern Corrugated products. Some may argue that Ben isn’t acting ethically with the other suppliers; but I think that it is unethical based on the fact that the other suppliers aren’t serious contenders.
Question 1: Auditors should not insist that their clients accept all proposed audit adjustments even though those that have an immaterial effect on the financial report. The auditors should be suspicious of any rejection of the clients and have to investigate deeper into the suspicious accounts. Moreover, auditors should not be careless even though they have close relationships with the clients and fear that they would lose potential auditing fees. Question 2: Materiality is a concept or convention within auditing and accounting relating to the importance/significance of an amount, transaction, or discrepancy. The objective of an audit of financial statements is to enable the auditor to express an opinion whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in conformity with an identified financial reporting framework of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Why or why not? Week 2 DQs Financial statements are an important product of the accounting process. Provide an example of an internal user. How could he or she be harmed by fraudulent and unethical financial statements? Financial statements are an important product of the accounting process.
He decided that not taking any action is the best action. While source one and source two feel like they have a collective responsibility to the world, source two believes that if he does nothing to harm the world he does not need to do anything to help make it better. Source two also leads on source three’s statement that cannot find the correct explanation and theory as to why the world is the way it is. Source two believes the world is a mess because of what people DO to it and does not think that maybe it is a mess because of the people that DON’T do anything. Therefor he is only just acting on his theory and doing nothing, whilst source three would argue that maybe he should go back a look at the situation again and look for a different theory as to why the world is the way it is and act on the new theory.
Though John had sympathy for the family pressures she was facing, but her unpleasant behavior was affecting the efficiency of the entire team and the organization. On the other hand, Andy another employee with CES and a team member for the waste management committee, made it worse by creating negativity in the mind of Vincent on the very first day of his office. Vincent resigned his earlier job because of the internal politics and did not want the same issues again. Vincent tough tried in altering Gwen’s job description but knew she won’t be satisfied with that too. John’s inability to anticipate issues and take up steps to resolve the conflict arising due to the Vincent’s presence is harming the output of the organization.
He didn’t think he needed to ask Express the moral problem so that everyone will believe that his or her moral concerns have been recognized and included. * This is a moral problem because his actions of using company funds for personal use wasn’t economically efficient productive system, it didn’t produce more of the products that people most want an less use of the resources people least value, which is a definite value to society. In addition to this, his actions wasn’t informed to everyone. * Effective use of resources, What are the economic benefits? * What are the legal requirements?
Also, since the board members are all in the arm length relationship with Yeh, the whistleblower would not protected from anyone by reporting the unethical concerns. When the whistleblower does not protected by any of management level within the company, no one would like to take an initiative to report the unethical practice and put themselves into the risk of losing their job. - The ethical concerns in whistleblowing is that other people seen whistleblower as betrayer since
Overall, I think filling the safety complaints was a great choice and that he did the right thing in doing that. The company violated OSHA and didn't take the complaints seriously. They also violated the employee by not acting on a serious issue. The courts verdict would reflect my job in this case because I would feel as If I didn't protect the employee and that I could of prevented the lawsuit. If I were a human resource manager, I would be ashamed and I would feel like I didn't do my job, and that I just ignored a safety issue that was serious.
Why is the lawyer so concerned about the change in his behavior? The lawyer does not even want to fire Bartleby even wants to keep him on the staff. I researched this information further to find out, why was the lawyer keeping him on staff if he was not doing his job? The lawyer felt that if Bartleby was employed by someone else he would become mistreated. The fellow workers were upset by his refusal,