Weaving of Grace Marks Grace Marks is a very deceiving and complex character. The reader never knows whether or not she is truly innocent, because although Grace denies being a part of the murders and says that it was all McDermott’s doing, Grace hints at the fact that she does not tell Dr. Jordan the full story. During one session Grace claims, “Just because [Dr. Jordan] pesters me to know everything, is no reason for me to tell him.” (216) When Dr. Jordan goes to see Grace, she seems vulnerable and innocent. However, there is more going on in Grace’s mind then Dr. Jordan knows about. Jordan is so eager to find out the truth, that Grace’s relationship with him produces the story he wants to hear.
Without this knowledge, Jane Doe gave what she believed was her informed consent for the surgery, which consequently violated her right to self-determination and did her extreme harm rather than good. She never had the chance to explore other options, because she was misinformed about her donor from the start. In addition to hiding risks from the patient, physicians gave her little alternative to her procedure. She knew she did not want a high risk donor, in fact she had “previously rejected another donor “because of his lifestyle”’(Vaughn 152). Clearly Jane Doe was exercising her autonomous right to decline this kidney, as she thought accepting that kidney may cause her more harm than good.
He also points out that no one ‘is going to want to pay money for cut-up whore’ – as in, in his eyes, the woman is now incompetent for superficial reasons. Alice dismisses these disrespectful statements, hardened by her way of life. Instead of the cowboys being imprisoned, they are planned to be subjected to a whipping, which Little Bill feels is an adequate punishment. This punishment could be seen as both an adequate deterrent and fair; however, the morality of this as a formal punishment is subjective. Instead, the cowboys are fined.
Women reporting Iraq Assaults” is single sided, and gives a strong look at the social conflict paradigm. Risen makes attacks at the U.S. government, as he journals that “the Bush administration has not offered to develop a coordinated response to the problem to justify the failure to protect the female employees in Iraq.” With demonstration of the social conflict perspective he begins to examine the macro level of society. The social problem of women not receiving support for their allegations of sexual assaults emerges from the problems of how our government is handling the War In Iraq, according to the bias of Risen. The bias presented in the article is a bash to the U.S. government officials, and an espousal for the feminine population. Risen argues that “The administration’s decision to rely so heavily on outside contractors … probably made it inevitable that contractor crime would emerge as a problem as the war dragged on.” His analysis of the social problem on the macro level keeps everything related and on the level of the government and the
Julia didn’t believe in what Big Brother is doing and unlike Evey her resistance to the party was done with little effort. Julia liked to have sex with Winston and for her that was a big enough rebellion against the party’s wishes. Evey seems as though she has a deeper loathing for her enemies then Julia did. The party killed her parents and so her actions I believe were based off
If Tracey did not have cerebral palsy and other disabilities would Tracy have undergone several surgeries and been in pain? It was because of her disabilities that Tracy was having surgeries and was in intense pain therefore her life was ended because of her disabilities. Robert unknowingly discriminated against his daughters health issues and the effect of that was him killing Tracy and claiming it was out of mercy. We cannot say or even think of what Robert Latimer has done is morally right or ok. If we do we are saying that anyone who murders someone else who is suffering or is in pain has right to do so.
Melanie Masters attacking opinion article “Killer Cars – An Assault on Reason” criticises owners of 4WDs for their irresponsibility and ignorance for other drivers but she also targets manufacturers, describing 4WDs as “death machines,” because they are responsible for many deaths. Moreover she attempts to induce a sense of anger within her primary audience of motorists but also a wider audience of safety officials that 4WD owners are arrogant and take no interest in the safety of others, only themselves. From the beginning, Masters attempts to position the audience to believe that 4WDs are a menace to society and those driving them are arrogant and “myopic”. The repetitive use of words to describe the danger that 4WDs present to society are quite clearly pejorative, attacking and highlights the stance of the writer. The language “Killer Cars” and “Death machines” suggests that the car itself is more responsible of death than the person driving it therefore positioning the readers to consider the safety of their own cars.
Why I Don’t Want a Baby Impromptu Throughout Polly Vernon’s article, “Why I Don’t Want a Baby”, she argues to prove people can live happy lives without a baby by appealing to pathos. In this article pathos connects with the readers through emotions. The two most prominent were anger and annoyance. In Polly Vernon’s case emotion was everything. Anger was a magnified topic when she discusses the decision with people of different reasoning and annoyance from being discriminated against every time just because of her choice.
- Also, you cannot assume deindividuation automatically leads to aggression e.g. being anonymous in a peace rally or pilgrimage. Also Nurses uniform - This study is unethical – people were distressed and believed that they could not leave - However mundane realism is an issue. They knew it was not a real prison. Zimbardo only should have acted as the experimenter.
Article Rebuttal Allen Parker XBCOM/275 10/12/2014 Tiffany Bostic Article Rebuttal In this article about “10 Reason why abortion is evil & not a Pro-choice. The authors show great deal of bias to support their cause. The facts I feel did not look at why people choose to have abortion but that it is a sin and is against God. Women today choices these options as a last resort not something that is done without great deal of thought. They do not look at the reason why some women had suffer from rape, abuse or in some case it is the suggestion of doctors because of complication from birth defect.