However the other two will check the one wanting to exceed thus, balancing out the power and securing citizens from a dictatorship type of government. Another reason would simply be when he states, “If men were angles, no government would be necessary.” In other words since we are not angles but are men if we had power in our hands we would abuse it. Then he continues that even though the powers are shared and are equal the government should still be able to control not only the people but, themselves. This will only help protect the people’s individual rights including the minority. In the end he says that in order to have a balanced government the majority must agree on justice.
This is amplified by the fact that the larger pressure groups can leave many smaller ones in their shadow. For example, the British Stammering Association is a small pressure group with a good cause but one that many people will not have heard of due to its lack of funds and support. Many say that pressure groups holding the government to account and challenging authority is a sign of a healthy democracy. After all, a democracy is a system of government where decisions are arrived at by majoritarian principles. If a certain group of people do not feel that they are being represented then a democracy has to be able to recognise them for anything to change.
Antifederalist leaders, including Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry, typically enjoyed more wealth and power than the people they led.I am sure these seemed like legitimate claims at the time, however, they are really fears unfounded by any proof. They thought that a government would do all these things but how could they be certain if they didn’t give it a chance? The Federalists, on the other hand, had answers to all of the Anti-Federalist complaints. Among them; the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.
Federalist Paper number 10, James Madison main goal was to create equal rights for the people whether they were in the high class or lower class. He didn’t want for the people in the high class to have more power than those in the lower class, he wanted for all people to be treated equally. Without Federalist Paper number10 people with lots of land or who own big businesses now a day would have control over cities and the lower class people. With this paper people in the lower class actually have an opinion in big decisions, for example when it comes to electing a city mayor, or city commissioner. That way he will not have to worry there would be corruption or favoritism towards people in any class, he wanted for every individual in the community to gather up and vote for the best candidate who they thought would best represent their community and have a safer environment to live in.
Thoreau believes that the government takes the power out of the people’s hands. He also believes that majority rule overpowers the conscience of man and that it is handled in a very improper manner. This also plays into how he feels about the unjust laws in the government. Thoreau thinks that the unjust laws aren’t fixed because Americans believe they have to have a majority of people who agree that the law is unjust and he thinks that that shouldn’t be the case. Thoreau only has the American people’s interest at heart and want them to become a better and greater people, this is what makes him a patriot.
The democratic system found in the United States is heavily slanted to the majority; their convictions are often implemented in legislation and used as the standard by which things are measured. Henry David Thoreau argues in “Civil Disobedience” that majorities are not right simply by virtue of being the majority. Thoreau clearly favors the individual and his convictions when he claims that “if a plant cannot live according to its nature, it dies; and so a man” (Thoreau). As Thoreau’s claims idealize the individual they also diminish the role of the government. Similar progressions can be found in Antigone, penned by Sophocles centuries earlier.
Agree of the agitation that could be permitted and where they should have an ending to it. “ The vast extent of the territory over which the inhabitants spread makes the collisions between the various parties less probable and less dangerous there than elsewhere” pg.75). Most candidates and people may think that time of the presidential elections as the moment of the national crisis. The parties have a great interest in winning the election but not so much to make their doctrines triumph by the president- elect help to illustrate by his election that the doctrines have gained a majority. Of course the president always defends his self.
First we will take a look at the positive outcomes for citizens and society as a whole if this type of program was set up. First citizens would have more say in the process of laws being decided and may actually help in the process since many government officials do not have the time or resources to go over every page in the laws they are reviewing or signing in. Also citizens would have more control over something they may completely disagree with, for example the recent decisions to insert more stimulus money towards the economy would more strongly be rejected by a citizen based vote than a Democratic majority based Congress. Also a system like this would bring our system closer to a federalist based system on which our founders wanted our society to be and would take away some control of our government branches and would give states even more say in crucial decision making processes. This would make it much more difficult for governments to grow and enact more control over its citizen's daily lives, issues and
I believe that most countries would not want Americans to be meddling the lands’ of others, day in and day out. In addition to that, it will only waste more money and more lives of U.S. soldiers that could be used far better elsewhere. If the U.S would stop fighting in unnecessary wars, then there will be fewer deaths. The U.S already have enough problems to deal with and the U.S. should not need to spend more money on unnecessary fights. If the U.S. would stop dealing
The more power he had the intimidating he was. And he could use that fear to his advantage. He could use to his advantage because the more people that are scared of him the less wars and combat that he would have to waste him time with. This saves him and his kingdom money because they don’t have to pay for gear such as swords and armor. With this he would have a lot more time to deal with bigger problems and maybe construction in the kingdom then worrying about battle details and how many men he will need etc.