Why does the president find the bureaucracy so frustrating to the implementation of policy? 4. Define Iron Triangle? 5. How can a bureaucrat sabotage his president?
* Parliament has very little pay, and low power. * Congress has a high pay, and high power. * U.S. Congress is more concerned with their own constituencies and careers than with the interests of any organized party or program. Also, worrying about the voters they represent is more important than worrying about whether the president succeeds with his programs. This mean Congress is a decentralized institution.
Present issue c. Present party affiliations in Congress d. roadmap 2. How does party influence come into play 3. Does the party completely control the decisions made by its individual members? a. No, some, like the Blue Dog Coalition (made up of fiscally conservative Democrats) or possibly more liberal Republics.
Furthermore, neither the Prime Minister, nor the cabinet signs a bill once it has been passed; rather the Governor General signs the bill. The parliamentary bill to law process is superior to that of the congressional process, because the American system, creates inefficiencies due to the all or nothing veto which the President has. Furthermore, this all or nothing veto system; creates what is called Omnibus legislation. Which is where several bills are bundled together; therefore, if the President really wants a bill to pass he or she may have to also accept a number of unrelated bills. Essentially, a President may be enacting a bill into a law, for which they know nothing about.
Faced with all this various obstacles, there’s no way the President will ever become too powerful and thus pose a threat to democracy. The Madisonian system (separation of powers and checks and balances) is strong enough to check and prevent such tendencies. In my perspective, the President isn’t ‘strong enough’ to stand up to the diverse interests in the United States and that’s because the Senate overpowers him. Also because the process to get things done is extremely long, frustrating and never reasoned by the people. The President is a human being like you and I.
However, he knew this would be difficult to achieve. He would have to crate a political system that would guard against the “mortal diseases” of popular government. Overcoming the danger of faction was critical to the well being of republican government. Since popular or republican government was based on majority rule, the greatest danger to liberty and justice occurred when a faction became the majority. It was neither desirable nor even possible to eliminate the cause of faction.
He was nominated on the ballot thanks to the support of William Jennings Bryan, a three-time Democratic presidential candidate. If all of the candidates were supporters of Progressivism, what were the issues? The three key issues of this election were how to deal with trusts, should women be able to vote, and should tariffs be used to protect trade in America. This book states, “Although the debates ranged widely, there were two general camps: (1) Those who argued for a small- scale, localized, producer-oriented
“The electoral college should be replaced by a national popular vote.” Discuss (45) The Electoral College is an institution that was established by the founding Fathers to elect the President of the United States indirectly. The Electoral College is a system that should be abolished and replaced by direct election through a national popular vote. Supporters of the national popular vote make convincing arguments that it is the best system to decide the Presidential election in a society as vast as the United States. However, there are arguments that suggest the Electoral College should not be replaced by a national popular vote. When evaluating the arguments raised on both sides it I believe that the Electoral College should be replaced by a national popular vote.
With this system, the judicial branch, the Supreme Court, can check Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional. The executive branch, the president, can check Congress by vetoing bills they have passed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The president checks the judicial branch by appointing Federal judges, but the Senate must agree with a majority vote for it to go through. Congress can check both the president and members of the Court with its power of impeachment. Officials could be impeached by Congress for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Without a strong central government, democracy was impossible thus America was propelling towards the gallows of failure. Roche asserts that only a functional governing body could effectively protect the earnestly fought for freedoms of the United States. ”When the Constitutionalists went forth to subvert the Confederation,