Methods of organization a. Illustration b. Comparison/contrast c. Syllogistic pattern d. Sequence e. Arrangement f. Mood/dominant interest Unity and Coherence within and among paragraphs 1. One implies the other 2. Unity might exist without coherence, but not in good writing Emphasis or Scale of paragraphs in relation to each other and the whole essay 1. Deliberate choice in order to make ideas clear 2.
Clear relation|material. Relation of|reference made to them|insufficient use made |limited way. | |your themes. |of literature to own |source material to own|in developing the |of sources. | | | |observations.
Research notes 5. Half a page describing what I know about my topic. 6. Half a page listing the questions your essay will answer and the questions it wont Things to do 1. Write an essay outline.
The hook, general information, or thesis is lacking. | Introduction is an incomplete paragraph lacking two or more essential components | | 15 | 12 | 9 | 6 | Explanation of Similarities and Differences | Many supportive facts are provided. Topic
Outline should consist of introduction, body paragraph and conclusion. You have to have a procedure to organize your main ideas. It’s not essential to write everything in outline. You should make a decision what do you want to have in your essay. Outline is the guideline which can help you start to write an essay.
A complete research paper must have some basic requirements. A title page with title of research, author's name, date, and school/university is one of the main requirements of a research paper. Some others are: introduction part: the introduction moves from a broad area of interest to the specific idea, method part: it provides a description of the study, result section: a clear description of findings and a discussion part and the reference part. An essay is a piece of writing, usually from a person’s personal point of view. An essay is focused on one question and an essay is written to answer that question.
1. Say what you will be arguing for. (“In this essay, I will argue that the injustice objection to Classical Act Utilitarianism can OR cannot be successfully met by the long term consequences OR secondary principles OR “intuitions can’t be trusted” reply’) 2. Describe consequentialism. (Be very brief –one sentence) 3.
Discuss the strength and weaknesses of using logic as the justification for your knowledge claims. What does it really mean when one says “be logical” or “keep your head on straight”? What makes an argument justifiable? And what are the requirements that justify a knowledge claim? Using logic in order to justify a knowledge claim is definitely an essential aspect but not the only one.
The assessment doesn’t focus on one part of the writing, so this writing was acceptable and compatible with the rubric. This assessment
Is your stated aim specific enough? Is your stated aim complete enough? How about opening your mind to the possibility that you have NOT identified the actual problem or the most fitting purpose? How about considering the possibility that you have not yet identified the TOTAL problem or the TOTAL purpose? How possible is it that the actual problem will not be known until you have reached at least a partial solution?