1) Pro-Arrest: Laws give authority for arrest without a warrant as the preferred, but not required, action in cases involving domestic partners. An officer who fails to make an arrest may be required to file a written incident report justifying why no arrest was made. 2) Mandatory Arrest: Requires a police officer to arrest a person without a warrant, based on probable
(Green Haven Press, 2006) | | | | | |8 |Identify the premises and conclusion of the |Premises: “Regardless of one's viewpoint about the morality or | | |argument. |constitutionality of Domestic Violence, most people would agree that if we | | | |are going to continue help battered woman in the U.S., we should be doing it| | | |fairly and rationally.” | | | | | | | |Conclusion: “However, three factors, unrelated to the crime itself, greatly
Bi How would you explain the term ‘confidentiality’ to Hannah? I would explain to Hannah that I have a duty of care to share the information with only the people who need to know, such as line manager, colleagues who are directly involved in her care, and her G.P. I would explain that her daughter does not need to know and it is my duty of care to keep her information private, unless she gives me permission to disclose the information to her daughter. Bii Describe the possible tensions that may arise between telling others of Hannah’s decision and keeping this information totally confidential. The information Hannah disclosed would be recorded, signed and dated, reported to my line manager and those directly involved in Hannah's care such as her G.P.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS JUVENILE BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. JUDGE MAGISTRATE MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION Now comes the defendant, by and through counsel, and respectfully moves that this court suppress identification of the defendant as it was secured through an unnecessarily suggestive showup confrontation. The evidence will show that this identification procedure violated the defendant's due process rights. This motion is supported by the attached memorandum. Respectfully submitted, MEMORANDUM On ______________, 199_, police officers arranged for a (witness) (witnesses) (witness or witnesses) to view the defendant without any other suspects
Government rules and legislation is here to protect and help people in the workplace. 3. Sex Discrimination Act 1984 The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 states that it is against the law to discriminate against people based on their gender, marital status, potential pregnancy, pregnancy or having children. It also sets out laws against sexual harassment in the workplace. Example When a young women goes to a job interview she cannot be asked about her future plans regarding starting a family.
A Child Support Guidelines Worksheet IS NOT being filed in this case. The establishment or modification of child support is not an issue in this case. I certify that a copy of this document was [ √ one only] ( delivered to the person(s) listed below on {date} Other party or his/her attorney: Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Fax Number: I understand that I am swearing or affirming under oath to the truthfulness of the claims made in this affidavit and that the punishment for knowingly making a false statement includes fines and/or imprisonment. Dated: Signature of
This allows the client and the attorney to communicate openly and ensures that confidentiality is preserved (Natoli, 2013-2014). The exceptions provided in Rule 1.6 cover the potential loss of life, property, and reputation but no provision is made to expressly prevent an innocent person being imprisoned. Massachusetts has interpreted the ABA MRPC and made such a provision. The Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.07 states, “a lawyer may reveal, and to the extent required by Rule 3.3, Rule 4.1(b), or Rule 8.3 must reveal, such information: (1) to prevent the commission of a criminal or fraudulent act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm, or in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another, or to prevent the wrongful execution or incarceration of
The ACE Code of Ethics is also something that was created to keep counselors out of trouble when taking on a client. Each client has diffirent issue that he our sure may wont to sure or may not wont to share just with anyone. So when going to a counselor a person is able to talk to someone that is not allowed to communicate with anyone else about their situation at all. In Section B Confidentiality and Privacy, explains this and also let you know when and who you can share information with if need be. For example, some that does not have capacity like a minor or the elderly.
Consent can be a defence to all non-fatal offences and possibly even to homicides, however a person cannot consent to their own death. In the majority of cases, it is assumed that all physical contact is an assault unless a specific defense is applied, whereas the minority state that you cannot consent to an assault. The approach differs depending on the theme of consent that is being investigated. In cases relating to sexual activity and sadomasochist behavior, the law tends to take a more paternalistic approach protecting individuals from themselves, as seen in Boyea where it was held that the victim could not possibly consent to such serious harm, even though she consented to the original act. However when it comes to married couples there seems to be a more laissez faire approach as illustrated in the case of Wilson where a husband branded his initials onto his wife’s buttocks, yet it was held that sexual activity between husband and wife in the privacy of their own home is not matter for criminal investigation.
Drug testing innocent welfare recipients violates a person’s rights under the 4th amendment. The 4th amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (U.S Congress.) The fact that someone receives benefits from the state in no way, shape, or form is probable cause that they have a drug addiction! Individualized suspicion is necessary to perform a search, and states may and do impose drug testing requirements on individuals who have been identified as substance