Morality does not come directly from God. This is the idea behind the Autonomy thesis. This option says that an act is either immoral or moral based on things apart from the commands of God. Actions are right or wrong in and of themselves regardless of God’s commands. The issues with this option mainly deal with the definition of a theistic God.
The Bible is the witness to the central events of the Christian faith. “It was never intended to be a short cut to the problems of Christian living, or an encyclopaedia of moral instruction, or a compendium of moral rules.” Some Christians, such as Liberal Protestants, (Church of England) believe that the Bible needs re-interpreting for a modern society, for example, many
are strongly in-line with Natural Law. Many Christians adopt deontological positions and think we should act according to God's design or purpose for our lives. They may be less influenced by Aquinas in this, and Protestants tend to be less sure about moral absolutes. However, there is still a strong sense of following rules within most Christian denominations. Aquinas said: “Consequently, law must needs concern itself mainly with the order that is in beatitude.” From this we can see that the Bible played a big part in the development of Natural Law; this proves that Christians make moral decisions through a multiple of different ways.
1. Backsliding into legalism: Non-believers were legalistic people who believed and followed the law religiously and rigorously. To such extend that these rules and regulations become a part of their daily routine and life. Once covered they had to realize and understand that Jesus is above the Law. This was like going against their natural instinct.
Most will approach caring not as a job but as a calling and as such will set themselves very high standards. I myself approach it with the mindset that I will treat a person how I would expect my parents to be treated. 1.3 Personal attitudes and beliefs can influence the quality of work in all roles of life. It is very important to identify this where necessary but more importantly to educate and train to prevent it. It is something we are all responsible for as an individual and as part of a team.
It do seems like everywhere we turn there is a different view or opinion of who and what we should put our faith. It is up to the person to believe and have faith in God. It is important to surround ourselves with other Christians that hold the same values as God do. Christians do love one another just as Jesus loves us. God would like for us to help those who is in need.
These three values are apart of my everyday life. Fairness is important because we all know how it feels to be treated unfairly. I strive on a daily basis to do unto others, as I would have them do unto me. This golden rule is centered on the value of fairness. Too many people use corruption to do things that benefit themselves.
EXPERIENTIAL APOLOGETICS Judi Fall Introduction to Apologetics /APOL500 February 7, 2010 INTRODUCTION Likely, the most important thing you can do, as a Christian, is to share the gospel with others. Whether you are a Christian or are not, you need to hear the gospel. But that being said, it is easier said than done. There are those who will be willing to hear and those who will not. Being able to give an answer to everyone who asks is known as apologetics, which means to “give an answer.” 1{Hindson, Caner, 28} Paul said in 1 Peter 3:15 “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord.
What is simple subjectivism? Explain and evaluate the two best objections to it. Simple subjectivism is a metaethical theory that poses that qualities such as good and bad are true relative to the individual; thus moral judgements are simply expressions of opinion. However, this does not mean that every sentence uttered is true, as someone may propose a claim that does not correctly report their internal, subjective state. Despite being a theory which seemingly encourages acceptance and moral rationality, subjectivism is deemed as flawed on two predominant levels.
Facts can be proven to be true, but opinion can be either true or not. However, opinion can be proven to be true but is still a perception of thoughts unlike fact. Fact is seen and believed by all, while opinion is only believed by those who state it. Opinion is only just a thought or speculation and it can lead to controversies. It may tend to dispel the truth whereas a fact is only truth and truth itself The distinction between FACT and OPINION is based on the distinction between knowing and believing.