Exclusionary Rule Evaluation Essay

812 Words4 Pages
Exclusionary Rule Evaluation CJA/364 Exclusionary Rule Evaluation When an individual examines the exclusionary rule, components have to be taken into account in order to determine a meaning or justification for the law enforcement to obey by. This rule does not have anything to do with the fourth amendment although there are similar. For years the exclusionary rule has been used in order to understand how evidence is gathered and apprehended. This essay will explain the evaluation of the exclusionary rule, the exceptions, advantages and disadvantages to the rule. Although the examination of the exclusionary rule may constitute deterrence for law enforcement, the rule still may be considered constitution although its existence (Zalman, M. (2011)). Rationale and Purpose of the Exclusionary Rule The exclusionary rule is separated into three parts. The first part needs an item to be physically collected as evidence. The second part is that the item of evidence has been collected by a governmental officer or a person temporary acting in their behalf, for example; confidential informants. Confidential Informants are told to do acts or buy thing that may be illegal, but they are doing it on behalf of the government (Zalman, M. (2011)). The third part is that there has to be a connection between the collected item of evidence and an unlawful act by the officer to get the evidence. The exclusionary rule is an important doctrine supporting the ideals of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment gives the people protection under the criminal justice system from unreasonable searches and seizures. The amendment also explains how law enforcement should obtain information by search warrants based on probable cause. The exclusionary rule does not allow some evidence, if it will violate the Fourth Amendment law. The fourth amendment

More about Exclusionary Rule Evaluation Essay

Open Document