Examine the Reasons for Changes in Birth Rates and Family Size Since 1900

643 Words3 Pages
Birth rates are the number of live births per thousand of population per year. There has been a long-term decline in the number of births since 1900. In that year, England and Wales had a birth rate of 28.7, however by 2007 it had fallen to an estimated 10.7. Sociologists have identified a number of reasons for the decline, involving a range of social, economic, cultural, legal, political and technological factors. Until the late 19th century, children were economic assets to their parents, as Philippe Aries said “childhood did not exist” and therefore they could be sent out to work from an early age to earn an income. However, since the late 19th century children have gradually become an economic liability. Now there are laws about banning child labour, introducing compulsory schooling and raising the school leaving age, means that children remain economically dependent on their parents for longer and longer, and are becoming more of a burden. Changing norms about what children have a right to expect from their parents in material terms means that the cost of bringing up children has risen, also. The LV insurance firm stated that child costs £186k just before their 21st birthday. However, as incomes have risen greatly compared to previous generations this cannot be a main factor for the decline in the birth rate. As a result of these financial pressures, parents now feel less able or willing than in the past to have a large family. There were also major changes in the position of women during the 20th century. Due to increased educational opportunities as girls now do better at school than boys, and laws outlawing unequal pay and sex discrimination has meant ¾ of women are now in paid employment. Other changes include legal equality with men, including the right to vote and easier access to divorce. However another big change was the changes in attitudes to
Open Document