He is telling parents when their children are alone they don’t always follow the rules. For example if you’re telling a child not to jump on a bed, as soon as the parents are out of sight they are going to jump on the bed again. What the parents think is going to happen is that they will only have to tell their child once and it will not happen again. The reality is if a child thinks something is fun then they are going to find a way to do it when the parents are not looking. Parents are not prefect and everything they say may not be the right thing to do, but pleasing them is the best policy so kids should do it anyway.
“By having them together, they form relationships.” When they are among so many different criminal associations with different behaviors this is more likely to increase the problem plus group experience tends to glamorize delinquency and drug use. The kids give each other more attention and comfort. They are in a competition of who can do the worst. Maia also said that, “Being put on probation, which involves more contact with misbehaving peers.”The source of one’s self esteem is how you stack up with your peer’s. Peer pressure worsens behavior.
Parental and family risk factors effects and shapes the individual into the person that they are today. It is vital for society to know the past life of an individual, who is being disobedient to the norms of society. Issues that are factor in criminal person actions are the following; was the parent inadequate with their parental skills? Did the criminal get abused as a child? Were they raised in a low budget?
Adults have a hard time making the right judgment calls, imagine the mindset of an emotional immature child? Compared to adults, children are more likely to take haste and depend on their irrational decisions making. This lack of maturity should not be held against the child. Furthermore, we should be protecting and educating our children, not taking out vengeance through irreversible punishments. By punishing a child through the serving of a sentence in an adult prison will only damage the child psyche and cause him to lash out to society.
An example of this theory would be if a child sees his parents or an authority figure he or she looks up to committing crimes or indulging in violence. That child most likely would view that type of behavior as acceptable. The social control theory states that people commit crimes when the processes which keep them in society are broken or weakened. Also within this theory, it is believed, the more socialized a person is as a child, and greater bonds they maintain with others, the less likely they will be to commit crimes (Siegel, 2000). Lastly, the social labeling theory view is when people are being labeled as criminals, they begin to take on that identity, and end up as criminals (Siegel, 2000).
That includes the kids who want to run wild, and for the parents that want perfection. One must compromise with the parents and their children; this comes with the responsibility of making sure the kids have a good time but at the same time, abiding by most of the already set house “rules”. Sometimes babysitters have to bend the rules in order to be the best. Follow this instructional paper and anyone can be a successful and rich babysitter. Just remember no one said this was going to be easy, it’s not something that can be picked up quickly; it requires the balance of fun, cleverness, and skills.
These parents try to avoid conflict as much as possible. It is very obvious that in a permissive parenting family, the child has control. On the other hand, an authoritarian parent would very firmly tell the child no. The child would respond to this because he or she would see their parent as the authority; These parents are extremely controlling and make all the decisions. Permissive parents tend to have more focus on rewarding a child for good behavior while an authoritarian seems to concentrate more on punishment for bad behavior.
Spanking is wrong Spanking is one of the most common forms of discipline used by parents. Although the very same parents do not condone hitting people, they believe spanking is a quick and effective technique for correcting unwanted behavior (Ramsburg 1). Ironically, by using violent and hurtful means of discipline, parents are instilling negative values in their children. The moral consequences of spanking children can have lifelong negative effects. For young children, parents are their primary role models.
This method is wrong because it had bad consequences. Parents can use the correct method of education when the child baby. Many parents never learned from their own childhood that there are positive ways of relating to children. For example when punishment does not accomplish the desired goals, and if the parent is unaware of alternative methods, punishment can escalate to more frequent and dangerous actions against the child. Parents believe that beating is a means of discipline and kind of education.
Thus, children growing up in these households are possibly led to believe that survival is dependent on being aggressive; also, they identify with these violent parental roles models having limited access to positive adults due to social isolation. This is not a causal relationship, but an association, which could be exacerbated by additional factors such as law enforcement being more punitive with lower socioeconomic class youth. This in turn could perpetuate a cycle of delinquency due to poorer families having less access to protective resources in the way of private clinics; instead, the charged youth is more likely to be institutionalized, thereby being exposed to behavior that is more antisocial. On the other hand, children from more privileged backgrounds may never face the same punitive legal outcomes, despite similar transgressions. Preschool experiences are another social risk factor for later aggression and delinquency.