Euthanasia Should Remain Illegal

1911 Words8 Pages
Euthanasia should remain illegal Euthanasia is a word with such great meaning but is often misunderstood by individuals. Some define this term as “the right to die” whereas others define it as “the right to kill Euthanasia is the act of encouraging a painless death or looking for the help for a good death. The act of euthanasia often occurs because long-term patients would rather drink poison or get shot by somebody than suffering their whole life fighting against a major disease. The term euthanasia is also known as mercy killing since it’s a way of ending one’s life who is not willing to live anymore.[1] This happens usually for compassionate reasons such as to reduce the pain of the ill ones. The two forms of euthanasia are voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia refers to ending the life of an individual who is unable to make the right decisions for them. This form of euthanasia often takes place when an individual is either severely injured or incapable of expressing their desires. In contrast, involuntary euthanasia refers to ending one’s life that openly expresses their wish to die and requests other individuals to end their lives.[2] Euthanasia is currently illegal in many countries, including Canada. It has been recently legalized in some cities such as Oregon, Washington, Montana, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Euthanasia should remain illegal because it takes away hope from the patients to get through their diseases, it creates conflicts between religious groups and it could be used for ulterior motives. If euthanasia becomes legal, it would be a treatment option for the terminally sick ones. The patients will have arguments in their minds about whether their life is worth fighting for or should they just give up? On January 21st, 2009, The Family Research Council stated “Disabling diseases and injuries,
Open Document