Euthanasia Essay

1538 WordsOct 14, 20147 Pages
Euthanasia * Is mercy killing a savior or a murder? “To be or not to be?” Hamlet wonders in his renowned soliloquy the meaning of life, the inevitability of pain and the uncertainty of death. Similarly, numerous ailing patients are wondering whether death is better than the suffering they go through. These individuals are looking for probable ways to reduce this suffering. Some opt for a solution called euthanasia. Euthanasia is highly controversial topic since it involves a person ending someone else’s life out of mercy. Mercy killing may sound immoral to some but it might be the best option for certain individuals. In Canada, euthanasia is considered illegal in Section 14 of Criminal Code (Law and Government Division). Those against euthanasia argue that mercy killing may pressure individuals into ending their lives. Moreover, legalizing it will give doctors too much power that also may not be preferred. They argue that if euthanasia is legalized, terminal patients will not receive as good of a care as they receive now. On the other hand, pro-euthanasia arguments state that a person should every right to die with dignity and without suffering. Furthermore, a person has a right to decide what happens with his/her own life; no one else should have any say. If euthanasia was indeed legalized, the practice can be controlled by the government. Although anti-euthanasia arguments are in some ways valid, pro-euthanasia have a strong support. Euthanasia should be legalized as long as it is controlled. Nevertheless, there is a common ground between both the opposing views on euthanasia. While anti-euthanasia arguments think mercy killing is entirely immoral, pro-euthanasia arguments partially agree to the statement. Both views have a key valid point: mercy killing is indeed immoral and a murder if it is against an ailing individual’s consent. Neither

More about Euthanasia Essay

Open Document