2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States. The criteria used for admissibility of scientific evidence as in the Frye v. United States was the systolic blood pressure deception test known today as the lie detector test. 3. What document offers an alternative to the Frye standard that some courts believe espouses a more flexible standard for admitting scientific evidence?
It must be scientifically tested by the peers and the peers must also review it. 4. In its decision in Daubert v. Marrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., who did the U.S. Supreme Court charge with ensuring that an expert’s testimony rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the case? Frye set the standards for,” Admitting scientific testimony in a federal trial.” (Daubert v. Marrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.) 5. What is the main difference between the testimony given by an expert witness and that given by a lay witness?
[Researched info] (parenthetical information: author’s last name # or “Article title”). 2. [Researched info] (parenthetical information: author’s last name # or “Article title”). B. [Main
Name Last English 0000 Professor 20 September 2012 Annotated Bibliography One Porter, M. Gilbert. "John Updike's 'A & P': The Establishment and an Emersonian Cashier." English Journal 61 (Nov. 1972): 1155-1158. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism.
Studies In Short Fiction 18.4 (1981): 413. Academic Search Complete. Web.27 Mar. 2012. Ramsland, Katherine.
BODY PARAGRAPH #3 (Reason three) A. Sub Thesis: 1. The third reason that you provided in your original Thesis B. Evidence 1. What information from either documents or sources is there to support
General Guidelines for Evaluating Supportive Evidence * In determining the rigor of the science supporting a particular policy, procedure, or practice, most professional organizations have recommendations and guidelines for evaluating research study adequacy. * Greater scientific credence has often been assigned to findings based on quantitative research approaches. Randomized experimental group designs are considered “gold standard”. * Internal validity: the extent to which the research design controls for extraneous or confounding variables, variables that could support an alternative explanation for the findings. * External validity/selection bias: the number of study participants and how participants are selected, with greater external validity assigned to studies with a larger number or participants who are randomly assigned to experimental conditions.
Example. Quote. Effect of language technique (aim for at least 3 quotes per paragraph. )When analysing techniques, identify the technique, give a quote / example and Discuss the effect of the techniques and how meaning is created. | ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Elective one: telling the truth. 20 marks Texts in this elective offer perspectives on the significance of truth in human experiences. Were you persuaded to embrace these perspectives? Refer to your prescribed text and at least TWO other related texts. The significance of truth in human experiences is shown to be of utmost importance, whether it be in telling the truth, or in hiding it.
"The Theme of a Short Story Called "A Worn Path" by Eudora Welty." The Theme of a Short Story Called "A Worn Path" by Eudora Welty. Web. 02 June 2012. Welty, Eudora.