Ethics Codes Comparison Paper: Code of Ethics Comparison between AACC and ACA Cheryl Walsh Liberty University Abstract The American Counseling Association (ACA) and the American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) both make provision for an understanding of ethical practices in counseling through their code of ethics. The codes of ethics presented by both are to provide clarity of ethical practices that protect not only the client but the counselor and the profession of counseling as well. This report will identify similarities and differences between the AACC and ACA code of ethics in general as well as three specific ethical topics chosen by the author. The three topics addressed in this report will be client confidentiality, sexual intimacy between client and counselor, and referral of clients to another counselor or agency. Code of Ethics Comparison between AACC and ACA When considering similarities and differences of ethical codes one should perhaps begin by clarifying what ethics are as well as the purpose of a code of ethics.
Each section provides corresponding ethical standards and rules as it relates to the section heading listed. In some sections there are references made to other sections that may contain additional information or rule that is being discussed (American Counseling Association, 2005). The ACA code of ethics is an outlined document and provides easy understanding and reading with additional subtitles within each section. As there are many different areas in counseling, there are accompanying documents for these areas. Within Christian Counseling there are more complex issues that are addressed and therefore The American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) created a document that addresses these issues in a more detailed format.
Research and Publication 8. Resolving ethical issues While the American Association of Christian Counseling (AACC, 2004) code of ethics “mission is to designed, assist members of the organization, better serve their clients and congregants, and to improve the work of Christian counseling worldview, to help reach the primary goals of the AACC, to bring honor to Christ and His church, to promote excellence in Christian counseling, and bring unity to Christian counselors." As well as the ACA code of ethics this document was divided into three units. 1. Ethical standards 2.
Ethics in Groups Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to discuss ethical practices in counseling and discuss why one type of therapy may be preferred over another. There are two main types of therapy that will be discussed which are: individual and group. First, there will be a brief introduction about ethical issues and the ACA Code of Ethics; Second there will be a discussion of ethical issues that are unique to both counseling types; Third, there will be a discussion on why a counselor would choose one type of therapy over another and Fourth, I will discuss any ethical challenges that I may face ,my biblical insights along with my personal leadership qualities and conclude with my approach to counseling. . Intro
January 27, 2012 IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNSELORS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapter 2, pages 34-35 This portion of the chapter discusses the close connection between counselors and psychologists. I found an interesting article about the subject in the Society of Counseling Psychology Division 17 web page. Title: Counseling vs. Clinical, What is the difference between a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist? In this article, Patricia R. Roger and Gerald Stone, provide a detailed explanation of the connection and differences between a counselor and a psychologist. According to the article, psychotherapy and counseling are terms that are often used interchangeable.
The organization is considered to hold the standard ethical code for professional counselors of all areas. Their focus tends to be broader and farther reaching, whereas the AMHCA specializes solely on mental health counselors and are more detailed to those in that field (Watson, Erford, Tasch, Kaplan, & Eliason, 2010). One main difference between the two codes is that the ACA’s ethical committee will investigate ethical complaints and take action as needed (H.3). The AMHCA’s ethics committee will not investigate ethical complaints (section IV, p.18). Another major difference is that the ACA has developed their code based on the five moral principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fidelity which are the standards that are accepted and upheld by most of society (Linde, Erford, & Cheung, 2010).
Code of Ethics Comparison Vanesia Toussant Liberty University Counselor Professional Identity, Function, & Ethics COUN 501-D19 Dr. S. Sadik November 04, 2012 Abstract The American Counseling Association and the American Association of Christian Counselors are both code of ethics that professional counselors musts adhere to. Professional Counselors are guided by the ACA code of ethics and the AACC in addition to the ACA code of ethics are also guide by the AACC code of ethics. The AACC code of ethics is for Christian counselors who believe that” Jesus Christ is their first love, to excellence in client service, to ethical integrity in practice and to respect for everyone encountered.”(AACC Code of Ethics, 2004, p. 5) This paper will show that both codes of ethic are dedicated and responsible for providing quality care to their clients. The paper will focus on a comparison and contrast of three specific areas, which consist of competence, confidentiality, and fees. Code of Ethics Comparison Introduction A code of ethics guides all counselors.
Although not all programs are CACREP accredited, individuals who obtain a degree in clinical mental health counseling, or related degrees, are generally trained to conduct counseling or psychotherapy for those who are struggling with life problems, emotional issues, or mental health disorders. They are usually found working in a wide variety of agencies or in private practice conducting counseling and psychotherapy. The clinical mental health counselors’ professional association is the American Mental Health Counselors Association (AMHCA), which is a division of ACA, although one can now be a member of AMHCA without joining ACA. Counselors have both an ethical and legal responsibility to be competent (Corey, Corey, & Callanan, 2011). For instance, the ACA (2005) ethical guidelines elaborate on eight areas of competence, including (1) practicing within one’s boundary of competence, (2) practicing only in one’s specialty areas, (3) accepting employment only for positions for which one is qualifi ed, (4) monitoring one’s effectiveness, (5) knowing when to consult with others, (6) keeping current by attending
Geertz offers a similar, more general picture of symbolism, stressing that symbols are the driving force for understanding world order. Through the descriptions of each author’s theories on religious symbolism, it is evident that all three anthropologists have many comparative and conflicting terms and definitions. Sherry Ortner presents her own theory of symbolism in her article “On Key Symbols.” Ortner is an American anthropologist who studied at the University of Chicago and Michigan. She started the trend in American anthropology to go further than before and find religious symbols that could sum up the particular ethos, world view, or character unique to a culture.
History of Psychological Assessment Mandana Smith PSY/525 November 6, 2011 Christa Washington History of Psychological Assessment Assessments used in psychology have quite an extensive history within the discipline and mental health field. Roles of assessments continue to vary according to prevention and treatment methods used for mental illnesses. Assessments within the psychology field are described by separate spectrums that include the differential treatment, therapeutic, and information-gathering models (McIntire & Miller, 2007). Gathering information to determine a diagnosis and facilitation of communication are important. This model contains standard testing providing comparison of individuals with similar traits allowing prediction of behavior outside an environment of testing.