Ethical Relativism Is The Value Systems I Relate t

504 Words3 Pages
Ethical Relativism is the value systems I relate to Ethical relativism is the thesis that ethical principles or judgments are relative to the individual or culture. When stated so vaguely numerous people and a sizeable contingent of philosophers embrace relativism. Other philosophers, however, find the thesis patently false, even wonder how anyone could seriously entertain it. Both factions are on to something, yet both miss something significant as well. Those who whole-heartedly embrace relativism note salient respects, in which ethics is relative, yet erroneously infer that ethical values are noxiously subjective. Those who reject relativism do so because they think ethics is subject to rational scrutiny, that moral views can be correct or incorrect. But in rejecting objectionable features of relativism they overlook significant yet non-pernicious ways in which ethics is relative. In short, each side harps on the opponent's weaknesses while overlooking its own flaws. That is regrettable. We are not forced to choose between relativism and rationality. We can have both. There are ways in which ethical principles and behavior vary legitimately from culture to culture and individual to individual. That we must recognize. However this in no way suggests we cannot reason about ethics. Rather we should strive for a rational yet relativistic ethic, which emphasizes the exercise of cultivated moral judgment rather than the rote application of extant moral rules. Or so I shall argue I relate to this value system the most because I believe that every culture has a different idea of what they believe is right and wrong. Different religions also have an idea of what is right or wrong. Individuals have a different perspective on their morals and values. What one person believes to be right may not be right for another individual. I do not believe individuals should
Open Document