Ethical Issues in Relation to Conrad Black Trial

2790 Words12 Pages
Ethical Issues In Relation to Conrad Black Trial Table of Content Introduction 3 The Auditor's behaviour and The Five Fundamental Principles of APES 110 5 The role and ethical behaviour of Conrad Black and his associates in HII scandal. 8 The role and ethical behaviour of Mark Kipnsis 8 The role and ethical behaviour of the four executives 9 The important of the auditor to behave ethically 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction The principle allegation of the Conrad Black trial is that Mr Conrad Black, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hollinger International Inc. (HII), illegally took the money from the company through a series of related party transactions that were not approved by the HII's board of directors and that he failed to properly disclosed in the company report. According to APES 110 Code of Ethic for Professional Accountants, related parties are entities who have a special relationship prior to the involvement in business deal or arrangement [ (Part A General application of the code,., 2010) ]. The special relationship includes: * one entity has a direct/indirect control over another entity or * one entity has a direct financial interest and a significant influence over another party. The Corporation Act 2001, Section 228, states that an entity that is a related party of a public company at a particular time if the entity: * is a controlling entity * are directors and their spouses or * are relatives of directors and their spouses A related party transaction arises when there is a business deal or arrangement between the related parties. An example of a related party transaction is a bonus/commission given to the director by the company that he has a direct control. A contract awarded to a major shareholder of the company to perform renovations to the company's offices would deem to be a related

More about Ethical Issues in Relation to Conrad Black Trial

Open Document