human rights principals, people should have the right to control their own body and life and the state should not create laws that prevent citizens being able to choose when and how they die. Pragmatic argument:euthanasia, especially passive ethanasia is already in widespread practice(no one admits it), so surely it is better to properly regulate euthanasia. For example, there is apracice called 'DO NOT ATTEMPT RESUSCITATION' (DNAR).no dnar if heartstops beating or stop breathing. Another contraversial
Therefore it should be no humans decision to euthanize themselves or for a doctor to make the decision to preform murder for hire. Works Cited Beal, Nicholas, and Stuart Horner, MD. "Non-Religious Arguments against 'Voluntary Ethanasia'" Www.Starcourse.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2012. "Euthanasia Definitions." Medicaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2012. Euthanasia.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2012. . "Euthansia." Rsrevision.com. N.p., 2011. Web.