Compare and evaluate the effectiveness of different leadership styles used in the uniformed public services In this essay, I will be comparing and evaluating different types of leadership style and how effective each one is. Leadership style plays a major part in running an affective team in order to complete the task in hand, but this all depends on what your aim is and who the followers are. There can be different leadership styles that may work for some people, but not others. I will be looking at how the task in hand can determine the best leadership style, and what styles are the most popular. Let’s start by looking at laissez-faire.
P7: Explain how team building leads to team cohesion in the public services, with reference to relevant theorists. M5: Analyze the impact of good and poor team cohesion on a public service, with reference to relevant theorists. What is team building? Team building is a process enabling groups of people to work together in order to reach their common goal. The main reimbursement of a team is to identify inhibitors that prevent individuals from reaching their goals and remove them, for a positive outcome.
Many in society would view being consistent as a very good trait and something that everyone should do. When someone is always changing their mind it is usually looked down upon in society. People who are firm in their beliefs and don’t change their mind are looked as great people and are great for sticking what they believe in. If a public figure had a strong viewpoint on something, but changed their viewpoint they would receive great criticism and lose lots of fans. Emerson’s view on consistency is, once again, completely different form the average view from society.
P1 1. Authoritarian is a leadership style where the leader tells the team what they must do. Some may say that it is really direct. Generally this type of leadership is not considered to be the most appropriate to get the best response from the group. It’s a good leadership if you already have all the information to solve a problem, or if you are under a pressure and is on a tight deadline.
These goals need to link with the organisations goals and KPI’s to help create a more efficient workplace. These goals become your team’s/team member’s performance measures in the form of KPI’s, These KPI’s measure your team’s effectivness and assist in highlighting strengths and weaknessess in the team. 2) Create and maintain a supportive, committed team How members of a team relate to each other dictates how successful that team will be, so having a supportive and committed team is critical and can make a significant difference on the performance of individuals and the team as a whole. Establish your teams rules, the ground rule are a set of standards that address how
[1] Of the four mentioned, I would have to put myself in the compliants category at this time. Compliants are people who allow others to violate their personal boundaries, mainly because they don’t want to “hurt others’ feelings,” consequently, compliants have a tough time saying no to people, even when the request for time or attention is out of line or too demanding. [2]Saying “No” is becoming a real issue, especially in light of taking classes at this time. Which of the three would you say you have had the most success incorporating in your life? Great leaders are great managers…not just managers of projects or other people but mostly of themselves.
Leaders set the overall vision for the organization and establish its goals and processes. “[A leader’s] ability to bring forth—maximize—the potential and abilities of those under [his] leadership marks [him] as a great competitor and leader.” (Wooden and Jamison, 2005 p.289-290). The next step is completing an assessment tool or survey which will allow opportunities as we proceed forward with creating and defining our organizational culture. The best way to determine the source of an issue is to ask the right questions to those that are truly effected by the issue. The survey will allow the participators to express publically or anonymously the specifics truthfully.
Sometimes this style is also described as autocratic. It is a common leadership style and is used when a leader needs to keep as much power as possible and keep control over the decision making. Subordinates are expected to obey orders without arguing back or in need of an explanation to do what they have been ordered to do. In the public services this leadership maybe used when you have all the information to solve the problem or you are working to a deadline. This is not an effective way to get the best result from a team, but it has some advantages in situations where there is pressure to get the task done, like in the armed forces.
In addition, having both management and leadership are significantly important in any organization that wants to succeed. In today’s management role, one must implement the functions necessary to be successful. In particular, strong leadership is imperative for shaping an organization into a force that serves as a sustainable business advantage. Having a vision, the ability to articulate it, and having the necessary skills and resources to carry it out is a cornerstone of one’s organization. Furthermore, managers should establish the following within their units: valid performance standards; provide adequate information to employees; ensure acceptability; maintain open communication; see that multiple approaches are used.
The leader will take all ideas and suggestions and make the final decision. Communicating the final decision will be difficult to team members if his or her ideas or suggestions were not selected in the final decision. Team members will respect the final decision. Weaknesses The biggest weakness of democratic leadership is poor communication that leads to the incompletion of the goal. Sometimes team members may not have the necessary skills or knowledge for the decision making process.