I had hoped that as time went on people could have learned to better themselves and become more independent. Sadly that is not the reality that I am now faced with. Now just like any other time people know unjust laws exist; shall they be content to obey them, or shall they endeavor to amend them, and obey them until they have succeeded, or shall they transgress them at once? All men should ask themselves these questions when dealing with the laws of their government. A government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, this is a lesson that still must be learned by people now.
All of these questions needed to be answered and the only logical way to resolve these issues was through government. The execution of government and such laws was in the best interest of the commonwealth for the public good. This is the main connection between property and the need for public government because without government who would preserve and protect these interest. Locke recognized the danger of leaving absolute power to any one individual, or group of individuals. Locke thought that the government’s power was best limited by dividing it up into branches, with each branch having only as much power as is needed for its proper function.
Thomas Gordon argued against this because he thought that if anyone would know how the government worked, it would be the private men. They would be the people who were directly impacted by the laws enacted and executed by the government. All people, therefore, should have the opportunity to have a say in what goes on in the government. The second concern for the Founders was to what extent the people should be involved in the government. Although the people had a right to be involved in the government, the author of Caesar No.
Locke believed that the government should never even be given such a great amount of power. Locke believed that the government was only there to protect people’s rights and to do so in the simplest ways. Locke believed that if there were ever problems with the government then it should be done away with, not fixed. Locke and Montesquieu shared a similar idea of limited
As James Madison stated, “whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial consideration.”[viii] They understood that the unruly masses responsible for the Boston Tea Party could spark a revolution[ix], however the frenzied approach would not serve well as a functional government. They understood that “democratic governing is not the same as democratic discourse”[x]. Boucher was correct, absolute democracy is not practical. This is why a representative democracy, where all voices are heard, but where decisions are made rationally, reflecting the views of the general public, is a logical solution for a functional government representing the will of the people. A representative democracy is a form of democracy whose foundation is built on common sense.
P Purpose Was is written to make someone think or do something? What? Why was it written or created? the reason why this source was made because confucius wants his leader to be educated and respectful to there empire “ The master said , if people be led by laws and uniformity be imposed on them by punishments , but will have no sense of shame S Supplemental Outside information. What relevant facts can you bring in not mentioned?
However the other two will check the one wanting to exceed thus, balancing out the power and securing citizens from a dictatorship type of government. Another reason would simply be when he states, “If men were angles, no government would be necessary.” In other words since we are not angles but are men if we had power in our hands we would abuse it. Then he continues that even though the powers are shared and are equal the government should still be able to control not only the people but, themselves. This will only help protect the people’s individual rights including the minority. In the end he says that in order to have a balanced government the majority must agree on justice.
Still the Electoral College and its difficulties remain. In his book Securing Democracy: Why We Have an Electoral College, Gary Gregg explains the origins of the Electoral College and options for reform: “The Electoral College does not work as it was intended to work by the framers of our constitution.” This is a problem that has been explored very thoroughly and there is as of yet no satisfactory solution. Despite the vital importance of our nation’s voting process, this issue remains unresolved—an obstacle in our nation’s dedication to representation of the people. In any discussion of the Electoral College it is vital to keep in mind the origin of the voting system. The Electoral College was not a spur of the moment thing and
At the highest level, the democratic government was formed by the founding fathers to have an explicit social contract with the people of the United States to carry forward the public best interest. This is the fundamental nature of a democratic government: there is an inherent, clear mechanism whereby those in authority can be removed if they are found in violation of the social contract to which they have agreed. This differs from monarchies and other systems of government where the social contract is less in favor of the people and has no built-in mechanism for removing those in power. The people of the United States agree to give up some of their rights in order to have the rest preserved through this contract, and the elected government in turn must maintain their end of that contract. Individual political parties sprang up from the demand to be able to compare and classify competing politicians based on their views; it become important to know, for example, which early politicians favored a strong central government (Federalists) or a more distributed government (Jeffersonian Republicans).
Name: Khalat Khan Through a thorough investigation of different cultures, political systems, and governments, I have realized that a democracy is the most practical form of governance of a successful society. The fundamental humanitarian and political ideals that are the basis of a democracy allow individuals to reach their fullest individual potential, while maintaining a sense of community and responsibility to the state. I believe that every society needs a stable government to protect the rights and freedom of its citizens. Contracts are inherently the basis of every democratic society. In order for a democracy to function properly, each citizen must forfeit certain individual liberties in exchange for his or her guaranteed protection.