Spitzer Space Telescope Make It bigger! Make it better! Telescopes have been around since the sixteen hundred’s; why not build a bigger better telescope in space! Space has always been a place of wonder for the human race. Objects appear to be close but are often many light years away from earth.
Also, the technology NASA develops to get there could improve life on Earth. Then again, the cost of going on a mission to Mars is just unthinkable: $1 trillion. Why is something as valuable as money going to be used for such a thing as this? They need to start thinking about the problems here on Earth that could use the money in a far more efficient way. Overall, Mars is not a suitable habitat for human beings.
Did American astronauts really land on the Moon? Millions of excited people around the world watched the extraordinary event, but on these days many people ask themselves the same question. Many different opinions have been said, and many questions have not been answered. However NASA has enough evidence to prove its landing. Should we believe them?
Even with Congreve's work, scientists had not improved the accuracy of rockets much from the early days of the solid fuel rockets. In the mid to late 18th century militaries need another and quicker way to take position of the wars that they were fighting in. Such as in the War of 1812 when the rockets where being used by British ships to pound Fort McHenry in the War of 1812. They didn’t use rockets to go to space because they knew slim to nothing about space in the 18th century and the rockets were simply too small to fly into space and they did not enough fuel to make into space and back. The solid fuel rocket has impacted the world today by sending us to
This is a very dangerous job, but I feel that human space exploration is a necessary risk to find ways to better our planet or maybe seek the possibility of living on another planet. Space exploration is very costly but without the use of satellites, the lack of them would impact society; especially the multimedia systems we use each day. Does human spaceflight really produce any gains in our scientific understanding to justify the costs and high risks (Argosy University course material discussion, 2011)? Human Space Exploration: Cost, Risk, Time, and Resources Robert Park has argued that in essence, humans are overrated: robots can perform the same quality of science as humans on the surface of mars, at order of magnitude lower costs (Foust, 2004). I disagree with using robots because they are not human and can’t see, smell or feel what humans can.
It is widely agreed that an asteroid, about 10 kilometers across, struck just off the coast of the Yucatan peninsula 65 years ago. According to scientists saying that dinosaur extinction came quickly, the impact must have spelled the violent end to the dinosaurs’ lives. Some scientists think the answers to whether dinosaurs lost their dominance quickly or gradually lie within the remnants of volcanoes. Massive beds of ancient lava found around the world depict an Earth 65 to 70 million years ago where volcanic eruptions were common. Other scientists say that the repositioning of the world’s landmasses was disastrous for dinosaurs.
Space has thousands of millions unexplored galaxies that could have the resources that we need to survive. Just imagine a planet full of water or coal Space Technology is the answer to our survival. 2, When NASA travels to space, we always get way more back then we put in and not just in dollars and cents. There have been many arguments towards wasting too much money on space technology when we should be spending it here on Earth. Why?
Others feel that Star Trek's quotes should be considered the same as the show itself: Fictional and for those with time to waste on naive optimism. The topic of space exploration is very controversial, with one of the most common topics of debate being whether it is a waste, or necessary use, of money. While the economic standpoint of the United States of America continues to loom over its people, the exploration of space is necessary, and therefor an efficient use of funds. Pound for pound, the pro's outweigh the con's of using money for something that seems so out of reach. A valid point on the topic is that the exploration of space is encouraging to young people who have taken an interest in science, and may even encourage some to become interested in science.
Telescopes helped discover many new planets and asteroids which ultimately led to the theory of the speed of light, Telescopes have helped astronomers understand gravity and its role on the Earth (Mason, 2008). With further viewing from the telescope it also showed us that light here on earth radiates from our Sun and all the other stars in our universe. Had we not have had the telescopes we would still be very behind on research of all the planets which are not accessible by any human or machine to this day. In the very early ages of human life the earth and world was viewed much differently mainly ruled by religion and the views of religion. People were less educated and much easier to be controlled.
Because Titan has such a dense atmosphere scientists had a lot of trouble studying the surface of the large moon. This was until 2004 when the Cassini–Huygens mission was launched. The purpose of this mission was to observe and study Saturn and Titan by using fly-by’s. The fly-by’s that have