Racism and discrimination is not accepted in mainstream society. However, SB 1070 contradicts this belief of equal tolerance. This type of law opens the door for racial profiling. It is empowering law enforcement officers to practice a form of racial profiling. As stated by Kristina M. Campbell, “It was heavily criticized as a law whose enforcement would rely on racial profiling of Latinos and other racial minorities and that would require anyone to produce proof of citizenship to law enforcement officers on demand.”(Campbell 1) SB 1070 is visibly targeting immigrants from Mexico.
Implementing laws to reduce the number of immigrants entering the United States illegally that lead to racial profiling has caused many controversial issues and arguments among people. For example, on April 23,2010 Arizona Governor, Jan Brewer, signed S.B. 1070 into law. That would prevent some immigrants from entering the country illegally. The law requires Arizona police officers to question any one they reasonably suspect of being an illegal alien.
An illegal immigrant is any person who enters the United States illegally, or any person who enters legally and stays past the time legally allowed. There are many arguments that support allowing illegal immigrants into America. Illegal immigrants are essential to the American economy, they contribute more to the government than they receive in benefits, and current” ihttp://www.customessaymeister.com/customessays/Immigration/9282.htmmmigration policies are discriminatory. 10.) “No, they shouldn't be allowed in the U.S. WHY?
However, Governor Jan Brewer took on the illegal immigration issue to a whole new level by signing the “nation’s toughest bill on illegal immigration into law”, as it was put by the NAACP (“Put an end to Racial Profiling”). This bill is known as the Senate Bill 1070 which aims to identify, prosecute and deport illegal immigrants. The Senate Bill 1070 would require that all who are immigrants must carry their papers at all times or they would be subject to a misdemeanor, while also giving cops the power to detain those they believe are immigrants. This however,
Federalism Proposition 187 was a controversial measure in California in 1994. Focusing on illegal immigration, California was looking to fix the large influx of illegal immigrants in the state. Due to the initiative process in California, Proposition 187 was placed on the ballot for consideration of the voters. This Proposition had a numerous step plan in order to achieve the goal of fixing the large illegal immigrant population. Proposition 187 called for the denial of health, education, and social services to those people who are not registered citizens of the United States, or to those who are not legal immigrants.
Third, the administration plans to crack-down on businesses who break the law by exploiting undocumented workers. Next, they want to make sure that legal immigration remains an available option for many foreigners. Finally, the President wants to encourage those who are here illegally to be responsible and register with the government. The
Funding has increased from 4.8 billion in 2001 to 12.3 2. DHS is on track to complete 370 miles of fencing B. Supporting details 1. More than 85 percent of apprehended illegal immigrants are from Mexico, and most are immediately escorted back across the border within 24 hours 2. Lack bed space, most non-Mexican illegal immigrants apprehended are released and directed to return for a court appearance.
Not only will the law condone racial profiling, raise constitutional issues, and political problems, but it sets the stage for other states with immigration problems to follow. Since the implementation of NAFTA in 1994 the problems of employment in Mexico has decreased, sending more than 500,000 immigrants into the United States each year (Miller 4). But where did they all go? Many migrated to Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and other states near the Mexican border. The states which were overwhelmed with illegal immigrants now need a way to control,
A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Illegal Immigration Carens, Joseph H. Immigrants and the Right to Stay. Ma, USA. MIT Press 2010 The authors of this book attempts to discuss how people from all over the world who enter into America should be granted amnesty along with other penalties for entering the USA illegally if they have been in America for a long period of time. Some circumstances such as arriving as young children or marrying a citizen or a permanent resident should strengthen their case for becoming legal. The most important issue for this author is the passage of time.
Will strict laws limiting our rights to bear arms decrease the violence? These questions have sparked many debates, studies, and politicians attempting to pass extreme gun laws or even gun bans. The national conversations sparked by violent crimes involving guns have created many debates, and caused many boycotts of companies that side with either party. The NRA fuels the fires of these debates along with the Liberals and conservatives. Liberal point of view is to ban guns to control violence.