These social differences caused much tension between the states. This tension was the first cause of the civil war. The second cause of the civil war was the battle being waged between state rights and federal rights. One side argued that the state needed more power to control itself and the other side argued for more control on a federal level. When things came to a crescendo, many leaders came together and secretly created our constitution.
Yes, American history would repeat itself making an interesting cause of stress between North and South. It was America's nature to fight for a specific cause and that is just what the country was willing to do. However, they could not because the dispute was between two regions of country or could they? This is how the American Civil War began. One section of the nation was passionate towards one side of an argument and when the other section adapted the opposing viewpoint, a civil war occured.
Separating the North and the South from each other, due to tension on disagreements of beliefs about the slaves, simply North wanting slavery abolished and believed it was injustice to humans and on many levels incorrect treatment to humans, simply calling them ‘slaves’ was wrong and disgusting. Whereas, the South believed that slavery had many benefits, one being that it fuelled the economy. Due to the division, the Civil War was bound to happen due to civil unrest. It can be viewed now as a positive and negative event. Positive, that the ending result of the war was that the slaves were freed and human rights were considered.
Many American citizens in 1959 viewed the Vietnam War as a righteous battle against communism, similar to the Iraq War today however now many view this war as a necessary battle against terrorism. Looking at America's overall goal in Vietnam, it is evident that we did not come close to keeping South Vietnam from collapsing, who fell to communist rule in 1975 (Frankum 210). America's involvement in the conflicts of Vietnam and Iraq were so discordant that our government, people, and military were constricted. Yet both wars were fought with the knowledge that America may change the invaded nation, which brings a precarious question; what makes the government believe that they have the right to go into a country and change it to the way they
Causes of the Civil War The Civil War is arguably the most famous of the wars in American history. This war did not just begin out of nowhere; there were many factors brewing amongst the nation that led both directly and indirectly to the Civil War. From 1790- 1860, there were numerous events that eventually built tensions so high, that the election of Abraham Lincoln as president alone was the direct cause of the war. However, the underlying causes of the Civil War explain the tensions going on between the northern states and the southern states. Most of the tension was about slavery and how the north disapproved of it and how the south refused to give up any sort of their labor force from the plantations.
The question of what events led up to the Civil War has been discussed by experts and by citizens ever since the war began. Was the Civil War brought on by poor leadership or was the United States setting itself up for war? Although many believe the Civil War was inevitable, the decisions of the American citizens and of the presidents of America could be blamed for the Civil War. “Even before slavery became a major issue of sectional conflict, George Washington recognized and warned against the development of sectional differences” (Section 2. How did Sectional Differences Threaten National Unity?
“Battle Cry of Freedom”. The Civil war Era, James McPherson. Oxford University Press. NewYork, 1988 James McPherson James McPherson tackles problems in his one-volume history of the Civil War, Battle Cry of Freedom. The reasons are evident: the war that separated the country in the mid nineteenth century still drives a wedge between some; the war, its causes, and effects were abundant and difficult and affected nearly every part of American society; and it seems that the bloodier, more complex the event, the more words we use to describe, and justify its events and effects.
The Missouri Compromise created a geographical boundary that separated which states were to legalize slavery and which would not (Doc F). This line represented a huge conflict between the two halves of the nation that would eventually influence the start of the Civil War. Another detriment of the Era of Good Feelings was the economic crisis that hurt the entire nation. This economic crisis was caused by two factors: Congress’s decisions and the Second National Bank. Congress increased tariffs on imports to reduce the competition for domestic goods, but this decision hurt the farmers in the south (Doc A).
“The ideology of expansion was widespread in the upper circles of military men, politicians, businessmen—and even among some of the leaders of farmers’ movements who thought foreign markets would help them,” (Zinn 298). The rest of the chapter explains the war with Spain and the injustices done to various groups of diverse soldiers and laborers. It would seem this was a difficult time for America, though, as by the beginning of the twentieth century, people would begin to feel unpatriotic and underappreciated. My reaction to this chapter is that I honestly feel bad for whoever had to organize this country during this time. The country was splitting up, with some people thinking and believing this and other people disagreeing and believing that.
When it came time for war, Great Britain was so influenced by the book that they had a hard time supporting the Confederacy, even though they are economically tied to them. This was a big factor in war because both sides needed more support than ever and if the book could influence a country so much to change whoʼs side their on, it could be a huge game changer. ! With all the copies of the book sold to the North and the South, “Uncle Tomʼs Cabin” was defiantly a big component in causing the Civil War. The differences of views in the North and the South were so contrasting that tension was inevitable.