b) It impacts your IT environment because without this things would get leaked and confidential information will be available to other countries. c) I don’t believe my organization complies with all of the requirements because I don’t work so this does not
To what extent does the Prime Minister dominate the political system in the U.K? The Prime Minister has many formal powers which come from the Royal Prerogative; these are relatively modest compared to the powers of an executive president. The powers include appointment of ministers and other senior figures e.g. top judges and senior bishops, dissolving and recalling Parliament, signing treaties and granting honours. However, there are also informal powers which make Prime Minister much more important than their ‘constitutional’ role suggests.
It is hard to deal with such an issue since you can’t teach those that don’t want to learn; therefore people will still remain uninformed. We can make it an obligation for every US citizen to vote, but that still does not fix the fact that there will still be uneducated votes in the ballot. That is why there are fragmented structures in the government who delegate whether to pass laws or not after deep research. I prefer that than having people passing bills and laws without knowing the outcome of passing such a law. I do not agree with such a fragmented government structure since it takes so long for necessary bills to be passed; however, educating the public about what they are voting and offering bonuses or some kind of promotion for voting and attending classes would eliminate fragmented governmental structures
Therefore, the role of Prime Minister and cabinet is one which is much more encompassing than is the role of President. Thus the Parliamentary system has a duel executive, the cabinet is a collective decision-making body, Cabinet Ministers are also members of parliament, the cabinet is responsible to the parliamentary majority, the parliamentary majority can force the cabinet to resign, and the Prime Minister is not directly elected; although,
A state is closer in relationship to the U.S than a territory, but the federal government has more control its territories. State governments share power with the federal government and are allowed to create and enforce laws without approval from them. U.S. territories still have self-government, but they must abide by federal law and whatever laws they create themselves must first be approved by U.S. congress. Also, although we follow the United States and it leaders in office, territories are not allowed to vote. The U.S. many times ignores and leaves out its territories treating them as if they were a completely foreign
Citizens can now access the information held on them by some 100,000 organisations. This act came into full force n 2005 yet even though public authorities are required to publish more information there are still many which can withhold information on the grounds of public safety or national security. In the respect this reform was of little impact as many companies can excuse not giving away information by claiming its for national security or public safety. One reform which has had a major impact on the constitution was devolution. Britain, at best can be described as quasi-federal as opposed to unitary state or a federal state.
A). The idea of the small confederacies, though they were not the most efficient ways of governing, seemed safer to many as less likely to abuse power. Others like George Clinton worried that a new, centralized form of government would not be possible to manage or maintain given the large territory of the U.S. and the vastly different interests and politics in the different states, that the country would end up divided. (Doc. D) Another point of opposition to the Constitution was that it lacked a bill of rights.
Gridlock occurs when the branches of government scrutinise each other’s action to such a point where neither can pass any form of legislation, and the government therefore becomes less able to perform its duties, therefore leading to a less effective government. For example during Obamas presidency he had struggled with the majority of republican opposition in congress, and therefore had trouble to pass any major legislation such as immigration reform, jobs bill, gun control initiatives and etc. On the other hand, others may argue that the government is not ineffective because of the constitution as the checks and balances system do in fact work, as a way to prevent an overly centralised and powerful form of government, which may not stay accountable to the people as much as it does to large corporations who fund them for re-elections and etc.
. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE . Exchange Theory Lawson and Leck interviewed various people and asked them questions such as, why they choose to date online, how they do it, and what methods they use. For example, Reid, said “The Internet is a place where people can take risks without consequences, and experiment with people you normally wouldn’t meet or get involved with”. Another participant, Lisa, said “I don’t use chat rooms anymore.
I personally say that strength is not given but earned by what you do to get others to approve your intensions. In other words, strengths and weakness depends on a personal capacity to influence the conduct of those in government. Power seems to be based on how influential or persuasive one can be. However, I also think that no matter how much the President tries to get what he wants during his term, the President will never be the most powerful man in the country. He is always sharing his power due to the checks and balances system.