Erikson's Theory

455 Words2 Pages
I chose to contrast Erikson’s theory and the selective optimization with compensation theory. In Erikson’s theory he states that the final stage of psychosocial development theory is Integrity Versus Despair. Acceptance is relevant to achieve Integrity. Whether the outcome is good or bad, successful or disappointing, having good friends or bad friends; we should accept life as it is without being bitter or angry. With Despair, you regret your past decisions, you’re angry with the course of your life, and you feel that your time for achieving your “wanted” life is running short. On the other hand selective optimization with compensation theory states that elderly adults maximize on the positive and minimize the negative. The main difference between the two theories is that with the selective optimization with compensation theory you optimize your existing abilities instead of dwelling on what you cannot achieve anymore. Unlike Erikson’s theory, you do not dwell on your past or past decisions Erikson’s theory impacts my life because I come across so many people that tend to want to be friends, but only for their own intentions. Once their goal is achieved the friendship ends. I tend to accept life as it is and move on. I don’t dwell on the “what ifs” of life. The Selective Optimization with Compensation Theory also impacts my life. I have a bad back and can’t work out as I used to. Instead of sinking into a slump and choosing not to work out at all, I do Yoga stretches, Zumba, and light impact exercises to still achieve my goal of exercising and leading a healthy life. Some of the pros of Erikson’s Theory are acceptance of who you have become and being able to make sense of where you are in life. On the other hand, the cons are fighting to achieve the life you thought you should have had and midlife crisis. These cons could lead to you buying that sports
Open Document